• RedPandaRaider@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    21 days ago

    It’s a shame Usenet has become fully paid. It’s what ultimately pushed me into torrents. And the fact that small communities don’t have all the content out there for you to download via Usenet.

    • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      Downloading large files from Usenet was paid pretty early on. If the core functionality of Usenet is now paid, this is news to me.

      • RedPandaRaider@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        20 days ago

        There weren open test servers though and sites with limited trials but no data limit.

        That’s what I used back in the day. Sadly all these trial offers are gone now and demand credit card information upfront.

      • Arcka@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        What do you consider large files? Isn’t the article size usually limited to something like 1mb (it’s been a while since I used Usenet)?

        So it would technically be about the number of articles rather than the eventual size of the combined archive? At the core it’s all still text right?

        • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          Pirated media(images, movies, ebooks, ROMs) uses binary posts, not text. There are different limits and retention policies for binary versus text articles, and most Usenet servers, particularly cheap or free ones, don’t host a lot of the categories a pirate would want at all.

          Please don’t imply that all Usenet providers facilitate piracy.