Ubuntu Touch, Sailfish OS, Tizen, Mobian, etc.

      • BorgDrone@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        “Why aren’t Linux based mobile OSes more popular if we ignore the fact that the most popular mobile OS by far is Linux based”.

        Gee, I wonder why.

        • Omega@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Come on, you’re being disingenuous. You know exactly what this person was talking about. You’re acting in the exact same way that people are acting when they unironically post the whole “Actually, what you’re referring to as Linux is actually GNU + Linux” or whatever. Come ooon…

    • ryujin470@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I was talking about other Linux based mobile OSes that aren’t Android or derivatives of it.

      • BorgDrone@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        They aren’t popular because there already is a very popular linux based mobile OS: Android. What would be the point of another one? Why would anyone want to use a new OS with zero app support and no advantage to using it?

        If you want to overcome the obstacle of being a new platform with no support then you have to provide a significant advantage to make it worth the pain, and there simply isn’t one.

        Why did people switch to iOS and Android phones when companies like Nokia had the market cornered? Because they offer a massive improvement in UX over the established players. What advantage do those OSes you mentioned have?