• palordrolap@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      “Just use Flatpak.”

      “But that will use 2GB when a system package will use 34MB.”

      “Duh, it’s not 2GB total. Flatpaks share dependencies.”

      “I don’t have any other Flatpaks on my system.”

      “…”

      “…”

      “OK, so it’ll be 2GB. Your next one will be smaller, though.”

      If I install one and if it shares any dependencies with the first one.”

      “Pff. You’re just a hater.”

      “Yeah, I hate that something that should be small is using 2GB of space.”

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        “Just use Flatpak.”

        “But that will use 2GB when a system package will use 34MB. Yeah, I hate that something that should be small is using 2GB of space.”

        “The space consumption isn’t my preference either, but I’d rather be using the app than fighting dependencies. I wish you luck with your dependency chain then.”

          • iopq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            The hypothetical hater is wasting time talking about it because you can install nix on most setups, even Mac OS

            And it has the most packages, a number of magnitude more than snaps and flatpaks combined

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Or, you could save time by not caring about the 2GB and just installing it. If you really care, get it from nixpkgs