Because touch screens are cheap and put the onus of design onto the programmers of apps.
Because touch screens are cheap and put the onus of design onto the programmers of apps.
Except they kill humans all the time.
I think it’s just easier to accept that there is an unexplained reason why humans can generate some kind of power that’s useful to the machines for something at some point between the winning of the war at the point of the movies.
Just ignore the fourth movie.
New tab tools.
You can even do a trick to make it your home tab
I do mine from home assistant. I can leave location services, Bluetooth, and wifi, all on without worrying about battery life for the whole day.
Ok. I did not see what you meant.
I have a home zone that triggers things. I don’t think location services uses enough battery for me to worry about
Cell towers are not wifi, but I think I understand what you mean.
I plan to live forever or die trying
You agree to the licence terms when you purchase the software. If you disagree, don’t buy it.
What is this based on? It sounds like something that would be against even the most basic licence terms.
Sorry, I should have been more specific. I’m asking about whether the concept of “you are allowed to play pirated games if you own a physical copy of it” is based on any legal truth.
I’m aware that the emulators are largely completely legal as long as they don’t package console bios’ with it. That’s why you have to go find a pirate bios to make your emulator run
Do you have anything to back that up? Or is it just “trust me bro” that kind of proves my point?
Did that claim have any actual grounding in reality? Or is it just an urban legend that keeps persisting?
The ones that pay are the ones running the ads. If the content creators have to pay, they will be the ones doing ads. This is how AV content has worked since the dawn of broadcast radio.
So, just like FFXIV?
You are conflating copyright and patents. Copyright is protection for the expression of an idea, like the art design. This is a patent issue, which is a protection of how something works.
If somehow I patent a vague mechanic like “a method of selecting weapons with the directions of an analogue stick or mouse, presented as an 8 direction on screen circle.” Then I could sue Red Dead Redemption and Batman Arkham, despite there being no copyright infringement with whatever game I made with that feature.
It was the best of times, it was the blurst of times!?
Sounds absolutely smashing
These click bait titles are getting harder just to understand what they are trying to communicate.
It sounds like it is potentially more precise. You can use software to extrapolate the input without the typer realising their typing is being watched.
You should check out the BBC guidelines for subtitling. They are really good and include preserving the intent of the program, avoiding ambiguity, and not spoiling jokes with bad timing.