![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/QbUU7Jf3Ff.png)
interesting thanks, that’s cool to hear. Sad that there’s no effort to move to a standard protocol, but understandable.
interesting thanks, that’s cool to hear. Sad that there’s no effort to move to a standard protocol, but understandable.
Probably because beehaw aggressively defederates from any annoying instances.
I would say Lemmy and the lemmy apps are currently set up to funnel as many users into any communities as possible, because there are so little people on here.
I usually browse rising (of all communties I haven’t blocked) so there is enough content. I imagine many people are doing the same.
The only fixes I see is when 1) Lemmy gets more users, 2) defederating aggressively or 3) heavy moderation or 4) having “high effort” barriers to posting in communities (for example: must have X much karma or write a message to the mods to post).
All my experiences on the privacy communties were that 10x more people from outside comment and are angry that I want more privacy. Which kind of defeats the point of communties. At the moment communities act more like topic tags that categorize posts, not as real communities.
Lemmy is pretty good for what it is, but it needs many changes to survive into the future, to operate more like how it was intended.
why would we be able to? are the any plans to open them up?
it’s people from other communities who don’t give a shit about any of this and are irrationally angry about anything AI. even if you could use it to diagnose cancer 10x more accurately, they would hate it.
It doesn’t have to be.
You could keep the general structure and functioning while improving privacy.
For example, by obfuscating post history, anonymous posting or assigning a user pseudonym per instance/community, auto-deleting old posts/comments. All optional features of course. Let instances/communites decide which of these features they want.
Keep the structure of Lemmy with it’s Reddit-like-ness and instances, but give users, instances and communities more control over data privacy.
Sure it’s harder to implement, you need some minimal-knowledge reputation system, but there is nothing fundamental preventing that from being possible.
The nice thing about federation is that one instance/community can stay the same data-leaking privacy mess, if they so prefer. While others could operate analogous to 4-chan (or anything in between).
Lemmy is absolute garbage on privacy. I would love a private Lemmy with fine grained privacy controls.
what do you use for illegal documents?
the sacred chants!
what is a prophesh yonnels
I just realized that you can rearrange Elon Musk to spell Lemon Suk
is this real? windows 10 literally came out yesterday
BlackberryPi Flipper Zero with LoRa and a thermal camera (because why not) would be cool
you could just design an alogorithm that heavily favors any posts physically close to you. the closer they are, the higher in your feed.
oof owie mein witz
More like Hammer Industries
Snapchat and Google Docs are the only two non-FOSS apps I can’t shake off.
It would be cool to have a Snapchat clone based on Briar.
Google docs because I don’t trust myself with my own data, I always end up delteting important documents cause I save them to random locations when cleaning house. Having it all in once place, with autosync, search and a nice powerful mobile interface is really convenient.
Also: “NixOS’s declarative configuration allows you to define your entire system configuration, including software packages, services, and system settings, in a single configuration file.”
http://github.com/matrix-org/dma-demo-app-bridge-whatsapp
This is one thing I’ve found on their github so far, but it seems inactive.
There is a fork that element seem to have forked back:
http://github.com/element-hq/mautrix-whatsapp
from
http://github.com/mautrix/whatsapp