Decoy321

Removed by mod

How in the hell do you find a 3 word title misleading? Hackers got access to Roku accounts.

This says more about their bosses than it says about ChatGPT.

That’s because they can “see” people working instead of, you know, using any actually objective metric.

Only in Australia

It’s called b

It was like a golden age of Internet. I remember being in some gaming chatroom with Ash’s brother, who talked about how him and Ash just made these silly videos for the fuck of it. Now I’m seeing Ashley Burch kill it as an actress on Mythic Quest and get incredible voice acting roles like Tiny Tina and Aloy. Go Ash!

It is not, because the issue is whether police CAN compel someone to give their password.

From the article:

When [Valdez] was arrested, the police found a cell phone in his pocket and obtained a search warrant for its contents. However they were unable to crack the password and Valdez refused to provide it when asked. The police were never able to search the phone.

Further down, italics added by me to emojis the important bit.

He was convicted in the jury trial, which was reversed by the court of appeals that agreed Valdez had a right under the Fifth Amendment to refuse to provide his passcode, and that the state violated that right when it used his refusal against him at trial.

Lastly, I want to add one important distinction. Fingerprints are physical characteristics, while passwords are personal information. Fingerprints are distinct from passwords in that you have fingerprints, but know a password. You can only get one of them off a dead guy.

Removed by mod

My dude, no one is as self aware as you think you are. You do yourself a disservice by thinking so, it means you’re ignoring an exploitable weakness.

After all, the only winning move is not to play.

It writes code in the same sense that it writes sentences. Sure, it could look normal with functional syntax. But whether or not it functions is a different matter. People get these AI to write convincing nonsense all the time.

It’s a great tool to help you get ideas, but it’s not a substitute for an actual thinking individual. Yet.

Because it’s an entirely different instance. That’s on sopuli, this is on Lemmy.world.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Fair point, but I still think we’re exaggerating the amount of doctoring that’s being done by the phones. There’s always been some level of discrepancy between real life subjects and the images taken of them.

It’s just a tool creating media from sensor data. Those sensors aren’t the same as our eyes, and their processors don’t hold a candle to our own brains.

In the interest of not rambling, let’s look back at early black and white cameras. When people looked at those photos, did they assume the world was black and white? Or did they acknowledge this as a characteristic of the camera?

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

There’s three different arm positions in a single picture. That doesn’t happen in the blink of an eye.

It’s a lot faster than you might be expecting. I found it helps to visualize it in person. Go to a mirror and start with your hands together like in the right side mirror. Now let your arms down naturally, to the position in the left side mirror. If you don’t move your arms at the same exact time, one elbow will still be parallel to the floor while the other elbow has extended already, just like in the middle position.

Thus, we can tell that the camera compiled the image from right to left.