• 1 Post
  • 314 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 15th, 2023

help-circle

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.worldtolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldTruth
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    You realize you can set up commands that get ran on start up, right?

    Including one to update apt or whatever package manager and then upgrade.

    Most versions of Linux can handle installation with no user input, or leaving the session. Kernel updates require a restart, but the update is already installed.

    (Whether you should or not is an entirely different matter.)




  • its not uncommon to start high and come down a bit. PLA+ typically has it’s glass transition right around there, and you do not want to be above that.

    check the actual surface temperature, if you can, since most beds, the surface will be cooler than what the probe under it is saying, but typically you want 55ish for printing temp.

    another way you can check is to just set some scrap plastic of the same filament on it. If it goes rubbery and pliant, its too high. the tricky thing about glass transition is it’s not a single point, it’s more of a small range, where, approaching it, it starts getting noticeably softer until it stops changing as much.


  • My guess is it’s warping from thermal contraction as it cools. PLA is easier to print with than, say, ABS, because it doesn’t contract as it cools quite as much, but it still contracts some, and each successive layer, it’s like layering on rubber bands, until it pulls off.

    there’s several things that can help it. The first is to use a heated bed. (you want to set it for moderately below the glass transition temperature PLA+ is typically around 50-60 in actual temp. I’d suggest measuring the actual surface temp with an IR thermometer… if it’s glossy, take a sheet of paper or a single-layer bed leveling test print and place it on top.

    If you’re already using a heated bed and the temp checks out, the next option is to print a brim up around the part. this increases the surface area. Additionally you can increase the skirt height to create a wall that traps air and keeps the part warmish (slightly lower than bed temp, typically.) You don’t need to go all the way up, even an inch will help.

    Going a step further, you can set up a box over the printer as a make shift enclosure. Or, if you’re looking for a more permanent solution, I like using rigid insulation foam- you can get it from your big box hardware store for pretty cheap. 1/4" 1/2" sizes are easy to work with and you can use PVA glue to hold it together, or most epoxies. (hot glue if you’re careful, but it’ll melt if you put too much on.) for just a one-off project, you can cut it using a box cutter, but if you use it a lot, there’s hot knife cutters (or wire cutters,) that work wonders… but that’s another topic.



  • this is probably more for things that people won’t bother stealing. I certainly wouldn’t be trusting my phone to it.

    I’d also be worried about it getting covered and misplaced/lost. piles of sand look much like another.

    Could be a fun geocaching thingamabob, though.

    Edit: I’d also suggest sticking a silicone o-ring on the lid. you can make them pretty easily using fish tank air-hose tubing. Pump it full of calk. If you want a solid ring, let it cure, then blow it out with an air-blower nozzle on an air compressor. If you want a hollow ring, which for this would be best, I think; blow out the tubing before it sets. then blow it out again. cut the ends on a bias and then glue them with more calk.

    For this, you’d never know when a kid comes running over with a giant pale of water.


  • Yes. The nozzle.

    The one part that puts a consistent pattern into the filament as it extrudes that can be corrected for variation from temps and materials and whatever else.

    Unless you’re printing abrasives, your brass nozzles doesn’t wear that quickly and defects from the boring out during production will translate to patterns in the surface.

    Most fdm printers might be accurate to .1mm, with the best getting to around .05mm in z and any measurement below that is basically random noise, so you have finite limits on how precise you can get measuring defects.

    This means that well tuned printers will generally be close enough that it’s hard to differentiate between them.

    Now imagine a pattern in an introduced by a warped lead screw, as an example. Sure this is cyclic. But its height is dependent on the lead screw’s thread lead. A T8x8 has an 8mm lead and this pattern will repeat every 8mm in height, with a consistent layer count between them.

    As will basically every printer using a t8x8 screw. Printing at that same layer thickness. Which is pretty much every printer on the market. There might be some slop with backlash, but that’s not going to show up accurately enough.

    And yes. You can swap out nozzles, just like you can belts and lead screws and every other part. Unlike most parts, though, the microscopic striations coming off the nozzle aren’t as inconsistent as say belt tightness.










  • and that is why standard sizes exist. The solution then, is to get every one on standardized sizing so the parts work.

    The problems are that now somebody needs to have and maintain a printer. (I presume FDM, but resin or something would be more useful.) even then, the production is limited, and you’re still having to source filament or whatever, as well as the parts necessary to maintain it. These parts are all more complicated than PVC pipe fittings are. (and depending on where we’re talking, may not even be available for a variety of reasons.)

    and when the part fails (as all things eventually do,) you’re going to be right back where you started. You might be able to get another custom part printed. if the guy happens to still be around and availible.

    Granted, the people running the study or setting up the open source fittings probably don’t have the money to encourage people to replace their plumbing, but that’s the solution that won’t see us right back at the problem in a few years. or less.


  • The researchers believe using a parametric-driven method for local, on-demand 3D printing of customized fittings will unlock more efficient water management.

    there’s a whole lot of buzzwords there. if the current system can’t be fixed becuse there’s no parts (pipe fitting, and pipes,) to replace the leaky bits, then how exactly do you expect them to source a 3 d printer and filament? More to the point… FDM prints themselves are prone to leaking, from a myriad of issues.

    I don’t think 3d printing the pipe fittings is the answer here.

    that said, it’s cool and fun all the same.


  • theoretically? yes.

    several problems.

    Food dehydrators typically apply heat as well, and sometimes significantly higher than a filament dryer.

    Then there’s the cleaning and bacterial contamiation issues- food dehydrators are made to be easily cleaned so as to prevent bacteria doing nasty things to you.

    Then there’s the various resins and solvents that sometimes off gas becoming toxic.

    Microplastics is far down the list if you’re desperate, but it’s there too.

    but otherwise, they’re still basically the same device A heater (maybe) pushing warm(ish) air over something.