Not for a company with 120 Billion profits.
Not for a company with 120 Billion profits.
Yea, view-once features in apps are mostly an illusion that’s oversold.
We have something close to some sort of an actual view once thing at work… it involves controlled access into secure rooms with no windows, lawyers, NDAs, security takes your phone and whatnot kinda deal.
A self destructing message is better than nothing, but hardly a guarantee
Sounds like a feature I would never want.
“HEY, I’M LOOKING FOR [hidden network name]”
Client devices can also do this all the time even when not in range, which basically broadcasts they’re looking for that network everywhere they go. That’s just asking for someone to setup a rogue access point.
“GIVE US ALL YOUR MONEY NOW OR WE ARE DRIVING YOU OFF THE GRAND CANYON"
Can I just skip straight to this part?
Probably something for @jerry@fedia.io
Thanks, that’s an interesting read.
I know that’s one person’s opinion and not a thorough research, but that’s still plenty of red flags.
I’ve used the 100 searches in the free trial, thought the search was fine, better than Google’s these days. The subscription is a bit steep so I held off, kinda glad I did after digging more into this.
Having what little employees they have also make a mac-only browser, AI stuff and email that their user base doesn’t seem to want is all a bit weird.
Buying a t-shirt factory (wtf) with the money they could have used to potentially lower the subscription, but decided to burn through it to give out free t-shirts. That just screams narcissism-driven to me.
Their vague statements on privacy isn’t convincing at all.
Some variation of “we don’t care about your data” isn’t in any way compelling evidence that you care about protecting the privacy of said collected data.
In my opinion they lack focus, commitment and conviction into what I thought was their primary mission at first glance: being a privacy-focused no nonsense search engine.
Although that’s probably on me for reading what I wanted to see between the lines and that never was their stated mission, which would explain a lot.
RAM is cheaper than my time.
I kinda consider 32GB as a minimum for anyone working on my team.
Yup.
This kind of spam has been going on for a while and is usually removed promptly.
Sorry, I think our local murder bot was offline at the time.
Anyway, they’ve since been banned along with a several alt accounts.
Don’t hesitate to report those if you see more.
Oh and I think we would rather not advertise their spam URL if you wouldn’t mind editing the link out from the quoted part.
Thanks,
The problem is there’s likely not a universal solution that’s guaranteed to clean everything in every case.
Cleaning specific logs/configs is much easier when you know what you’re dealing with.
Something like anonymizing a Cisco router config is easy enough because it folllows a known format that you can parse and clean.
Building a tool to anonymize some random logs from a specific software is one thing, anonymizing all logs from any software is unlikely.
Either way, it should always be double-checked and tailored to what’s being logged.
It depends a lot on what the application is logging to begin with.
If a project prints passwords in logs, consider to just GTFO as it’s terrible security practice.
There might also be sensitive info that’s not coming from a static thing like your username, but from variable data such as IP addresses, gps coordinates, or whatever thing gets logged.
Meaning a simple find&replace might be insufficient.
When possible, I tend to replace the info I remove with a short name of what I replaced out as it’s easier to understand context when it’s not all **********
or truncated.
example:
proxy_container_1 | <redacted_client1_ip> - - [17/Aug/2024:12:39:06 +0000] "GET /u/<redacted_local_user2> HTTP/1.1" 200 963 "-" "Lemmy/0.19.4; +<redacted_remote_instance3_fqdn>"
keeping the same placeholders for subsequent substitutions helps because if everything is the same, then you don’t know what’s what anymore.
(this single line would be easy enough either way, but if you have a bunch and can’t tell client1 from client50 apart anymore that can hinder troubleshooting.
regular expressions are useful in doing that, but something that works on a specific set of logs might miss sensitive info in another.
I’m sure people have made tools to help with that, possibly with regex patterns for common stuff, but even with that, you’d need to doublecheck the output to be 100% sure.
It helps a lot when whatever app doesn’t log too much sensitive info to begin with, but that’s usually out of your hands as a user.
Yea I know, it’s great.
I didn’t because I didn’t need one, but printing bridging features in zero-G must be something else.
Resin printing in space would be such a mess though.
That was blowing my mind the first time I printed a prototype. Still kinda does.
That and sharing models is great. Like I can literally download a physical object. Sure the printing is an extra step, but that’s still amazing to me 10 years after firing up my first printer.
Haven’t had to use port forwarding for gaming in like 30 or so years, so I just looked up Nintendo’s website…
Within the port range, enter the starting port and the ending port to forward. For the Nintendo Switch console, this is port 1024 through 65535
LMAO, no thanks, that’s not happening.
For your question, you could likely route everything through a tunnel and manage the port forwarding on the other end of the tunnel.
This is the same kind of thing I’d expect when a once nice android app gets bought out by a company like tencent.
Bundle a battery manager and RAM optimizer bs in the file browser or something, fill it with ads, maybe they could have microtransactions for some of the “features”.
They do, but something like fucksmith’s pizza would be upvoted for being funny, not for being correct.
The LLM wouldn’t know the difference.
Firefox mobile:
My guess is you’re trying to open tabs by opening the tab manager (square icon with number in it), adding an empty tab, then go from there?
That would bring you to the “home” tab or whatever they call it… a mishmash of a small number of favorites and recent stuff, and yea that’s kinda convoluted.
In your case, you know you wanna open a bookmark, go to bookmarks directly from your current tab (… menu/bookmarks), then just use open in new tab from there.
Open in new tab works on single bookmarks and to open all bookmarks within a folder.
You can just put bookmarks in folders.
Pretty sure that’s a been a feature of nearly every browser I’ve used since Netscape.
Nowadays you can use whatever context menu to open all bookmarks in a folder in tabs.
This post is 2 days old, we are now officially old people.
Yea, but if you have your own OC devastation, you can broadcast your gofundme scam or whatever.