i didnt voice any opinion on what the extreme or far left are, so i imagine you either didnt understand my comment or are being contrarian for the sake of being contrarian
i didnt voice any opinion on what the extreme or far left are, so i imagine you either didnt understand my comment or are being contrarian for the sake of being contrarian
no, it is the mainstream view on non-western far-left groups too
this is the mainstream view on the far-left
you can be annoyed about something someone is doing without making some personal judgement about that someone
if my train is late because the train driver had a heart attack im aware that its not the drivers fault, but im still not going to be thrilled about my luck
this is an extraordinarily terrible title
because it either is or isnt what the users expect or admins want
its the fediverse, if you disagree with an instance’ curation policies you can leave
the only thing twitter is still good for is art and porn, so i use it for art and porn
no actually, since the conversation is explicitly about conspiracy to commit murder, arguing that any belief in enforcing participation in society constitutes that is explicitly saying that having laws automatically means killing people
you dont actually get to say ‘violence’ instead of ‘murder’ in a conversation about murder, and then pretend that you arent talking about murder
unless this is you admitting that communism is not actually a conspiracy to commit murder, in which case cool i agree!
i have no clue how this happened
somewhere between soc dem and communist
i have a list of issues that i want fixed, and whether that happens by achieving communist utopia or just properly regulated capitalism isnt that important to me
i do not use adblock on content creation sites like youtube
its a small effort for what i assume is a small bit of support for the content im watching
i just never had an issue with ads, theyre unobtrusive and i can just do something else while theyre playing
being forced to participate in society is called following the laws of the country youre in
am i correctly understanding that you believe that enforcing the law automatically necessitates killing people? thats a pretty scary thing to believe, and in no way indicative of any particular ideology im sure
its also false, considering the continued existence of countries that have abolished the death penalty entirely
on a side note, can you explain why you moved the goal posts from ‘communists want to kill everyone’ to ‘well maybe not all of them but the ones that dont will never succeed’ to ‘well having laws means killing people’
If kumbaya is their plan, well, it isn’t going to succeed.
it sure seems like this is less about communists believing that violence is necessary, and more about you believing violence is necessary
actually, you distinctly said ‘every communist ive pushed far enough’, not ‘literally every communist’
im not a communist and my explaining how violence is not a literal part of the definition for communism as it is with fascism is not proselytism
is that what you were doing? trying to get folks to join your cult of fascism?
because regardless or anecdotes, a communist ideal does not by definition necessitate a conspiracy to commit murder
even if not a single pacifist communist existed, and they do, itd still be totally possible to be both a pacifist and a communist
in contrast, violence is a fundamental part of what makes fascism fascism. a fascist party will never be pacifistic, because it would no longer be fascist
no, conspiracy to commit murder is not an inherent aspect of communist ideology in the same way that it is integral to fascism
its the principle behind the ‘right to be forgotten’
if you posted something to a public forum and changed your mind, deciding it shouldnt be public after all, you should have that option
i can excuse hiring mercenaries to rough a guy up for leaking cards, but using AI art is a step too far!