![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/h1ChnLuBHr.png)
Moved to Firefox some months ago, it’s fine. Small adjustment but browsers generally offer high interchangeability
Moved to Firefox some months ago, it’s fine. Small adjustment but browsers generally offer high interchangeability
We demand infinite growth. Why? Because shareholders want to buy shares and sell them later for more.
Do anything it takes to make that transaction happen, cut people’s jobs en masse, whatever.
Forever.
He’s broadcasting to all businesses and billionaires that anyone who strongly supports him gets their back rubbed right back.
He’s not saying EVs are great, that we should support them because it’s good policy, the right move for America etc.
Its simply quid pro quo.
Yeah, fully agree. This is one of the reasons big tech is dangerous with AI, their sense of humanity and their instincts on what’s right are way off.
Oozes superficiality. Say anything do anything for market share.
Can’t remember the last time I was on Twitter. Turns out I don’t need it. Turns out I’m just a little happier without it.
Snuggling? Uh, that’s a hard no. I can’t imagine that. I’d be extremely uncomfortable.
Hugging? Yup, lots of hugging in my friends and family.
I don’t wish for more physical affection among males, seems good as is.
Nestle and Adobe, on my special list.
Imagine China comes out on top over the next few decades and then reach AGI with the CCP mindset.
That would be the enslavement of humanity on a scale never before seen or imagined
People down voting have no sense of humor.
This guy is an incredibly dangerous parasite with apex predator instincts. Fucking up games is one thing, but stepping closer to the social fabric is a next level concern.
Yup. Shareholders are the problem, who bought shares at price X and want to sell those shares at X+Y.
And they will do anything to get it.
Jesus Christ, can we leave things alone that aren’t infinitely growing
If these fuckers touch notepad I’ll riot.
Actually that’s not true, I’ll just be quietly annoyed.
For this reason I have never and will never buy an Adobe product. I’m an anti Adobe activist in all decision making conversations around their product suite and services.
I’ll never change my mind.
They already do, who do they think called the shots when Altman was tossed out? Santa Claus?
My fun guesswork here is that I don’t think the neural net weights change during querying, only during training. Otherwise the models could be permanently damaged by users.
It’s not companies pulling ads that kills the platform. That’s not a root cause. Ads pulling out is a consequence.
The root cause of this, is the platform owner choosing to publically engage with a heavily charged emotional minefield where everyone and their dog has chosen hills to die on.
If your goal is to try make Twitter a successful company, wading into that mess is simply not a high quality decision.
With his ethics there’s no way I’d let any company controlled by him attach itself to my brain.
I have a hard time imagining that for any profit driven corporation, but most especially him.