Based Count head admin.

Some of the tools I’ve created:

I speak: 🇮🇹 🇬🇧 🇫🇷

  • 1 Post
  • 29 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 17th, 2023

help-circle





  • Exciting stuff! In particual I really like how neatly organized the project roadmap is, with a quick glance at the project GitHub page I can tell what you guys are working on and how development is proceding.

    Also, props for using a widely established language like Java. I know Rust has lots of advantages and is all in all an awesome language, but having to learn a new language just to be able to contribute and submit PRs to your favourite open source project kinda kills the hype (and takes away a bunch of time).


  • Yeah sure. Assuming you are only targeting Lemmy instances (other softwares make this a bit more complicated), A “can interact” with B if:

    • A hasn’t blocked B
    • B hasn’t blocked A
    • Neither A nor B are on allowlist. If either is on allowlist, it must have explicitly added the other one to its allow list (this is very uncommon, the only big instance using allow lists is hexbear.net)

    So, to verify this, you could query the Defed Investigator with the instances you care about, one at a time. Only select the softwares you care about (likely only Lemmy) to make the query faster. Say you wanted to verify the compatibility between lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works (just making an example). Go to https://defed.xyz/check?name=sh.itjust.works&software=lemmy

    • lemmy.world doesn’t appear in the “Instances defederated from sh.itjust.works” (this means .world hasn’t blocked SJW)
    • lemmy.world doesn’t appear in the “Instances defederated by sh.itjust.works” (this means SJW hasn’t blocked .world)
    • lemmy.world doesn’t appear among the “Instances not allowing sh.itjust.works” (this means .world isn’t on allowlist or, if it is, it has explicitly allowed SJW. Again, this is very uncommon)

    Also make sure the instance you are looking for isn’t among the “Instances that returned errors”, of course.






  • I think apps would need to be rewritten from the ground up with ActivityPods as a basis instead of every software’s ActivityPub implementation. Very interesting technology and it definitely does solve a shortcoming that the Fediverse tends to have at the moment. (Mastodon sorta has a SSO implementation of its own but other services lack it and it’s quite the issue). But I am afraid most Fedi developers won’t rebuild their apps just for this.