split tunneling is not 100% secure
This keeps being said and I don’t understand why people keep saying it. Split tunneling should be exactly as secure as your route table makes it, shouldn’t it?
split tunneling is not 100% secure
This keeps being said and I don’t understand why people keep saying it. Split tunneling should be exactly as secure as your route table makes it, shouldn’t it?
This was annoying me too, and I solved it by spinning out a VM that exists just to run qbittorrent and the vpn connection.
I would think that an on-call night would make for an automatic work from home day + sleeping in the following day.
Can’t believe there’s this many comments with Technology Connections being listed.
Not just stores, but inventory of goods in general. The thought is that resources spent on inventory are resources which could have otherwise been spent elsewhere. This line of thinking and fixation on Just-In-Time goods deliveries was one of the most important factors in the supply chain fuckery around covid, which only began to stabilize last year.
excess inventory is waste. Always have a buffer to handle shenanigans and/or be able to source the next thing,and avoid being up shit creek the next time the TP truck is a week late.
A lot of that range anxiety will start to evaporate as charging (both slow and fast) becomes more ubiquitous. If I can charge to 80% in 15 minutes I don’t need a lot more than 2-3 hours of drive time on a single charge, so long as there’s a charging station at that interval.
Fellas, is it petty to refuse to support Nazis?
I think a lot of the concern here, for me if noone else, is them taking the data and then turning it around into a closed for-sale product. If AI is going to be trained, it should be trained well, but if the result of doing so is them turning around and charging [me/us/everyone, as applicable] an ass load for the privilege of its use then I want no part of it.
AI trained on public data should be public. So if adding boilerplate is the solution to this problem, let it be infectious licensing which forces opening of the resultant model to the public.
I think there might be something to be said here for some potential selection bias. Are Tesla drivers like ram drivers, overly aggressive idiots but with the added layer of being relatively new tech?
I’m convinced that Trekkies and open source tech are concentric circles.
So now they can pause comments until the heat dies down while looking reasonable because of the existing comments.
A lot of politician-level takes in this thread.
The record labels that own Spotify
Oh, I have no issues with pony people. I was more disappointed that UwUntu wasn’t as UwU as I really hoped it would be after I discovered it was a real thing.
At some level I just wanted it to commit to the bit, even if it’s at the cost of usability. Maybe only on 1 Apr or something.
I don’t know what’s worse, that this is real or that it appears to be relatively serious and not just taking Ubuntu and doing an UwU text transform on every localized string.
It also took several years of utter dominance before they started to drift into their current monstrousness. It's not just that they won, but they also stayed winning.
If you conspiracy board right back at them, the conclusion I come to is that Signal is starting to see some market penetration into non-technical spaces and that’s a problem for… someone. Dealer’s choice for whom. So, time to spread some FUD.
That depends on the software in question, but generally it will play a degraded version of the content.
I may be alone in this, but rather than profiles, a pseudonymous ‘map chat’ would be really useful jn a number of ways.
While its nice when a program let’s you pick the egress interface for its network traffic, split tunneling is still on the host os for handling its route table and making sure that’s set up correctly. Like, were people setting up split tunnel networks where they were treating the vpn interface as a proxy, pointing the software at it, and just hoping for the best?