

Genuine question: how is this a privacy invasion? Isn’t it simply digitising the already needed paperwork?


Genuine question: how is this a privacy invasion? Isn’t it simply digitising the already needed paperwork?
Wat dis dud sed ⬆️


Large Brain Move
That’s every software engineer’s endgame, better to get ahead of the game now 😤


Hope they learn the hard way to stay away from overly powerful centralised systems, I can see that, probably, when they made their choice, the stance of the service seemed good enough to bite the bullet and have a convenient setup, but we’ve seen time and time again how corporate will comply with governments as they rightly have to do, only privately can you really not care, though you also take the responsibility for that. What we can hope is that decentralisation makes the crackdown harder to put into effect


Not even trying the Plan B?
Haha, we’re not far from each other then, could have been worse than worse
they heard people were putting porn or smth on there lol
They weren’t wrong, lmao
Douyin will be a decade old by 2026
TIL TikTok has a second (or rather first) identity as Douyin, don’t think I heard of that before


Yay, when VSE rework 🥺
Oh I see
I’m not sure if it’s related, but have you already tried changing adaptive sync options?
Why is Denny DeVito a free software advocate now?
That sucks majorly, I knew GitLab isn’t our friend, but to plain dismiss a development effort that didn’t even come from their own employees is just spitting in our face.
Forgejo federation can’t come any sooner ✊
This is just a shame :/


They kinda did in the README, though that’s not really how you comply with the license


What were they?


all software is shit
Based
Totally agree on this, but as for the rest, I’m guessing this only expedites linking up information by virtue of it being in a computerised system rather than enabling it at all.
It is very worrisome that a party like that could get into power, but it doesn’t change how it’s always been, we are at the “mercy” of our government, if they want to single out a demographic and actively hamper it, they will find a way regardless of the tools in use.
To focus on this as a bad aspect looks to me like it’s sort of missing the point, this more or less should provide an easier management of information.
What could be argued instead, is that it is locking out people who don’t have the access to devices enabled to it, which is a real problem if they want to phase out papers completely. Here in Italy already with the IO app we can (so it’s currently fully optional) have our driving licence digitised, but that single feature doesn’t work (at least for now, and it’s been almost a year by now that support hasn’t been added) on GrapheneOS, for example.
I think the real issues are two: a hostile government, which holds true regardless of methods, and lack of support for secure and private platforms which the citizens should 100% be entitled to use