• 17 Posts
  • 311 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 7th, 2023

help-circle






  • The number one thing that most of these don’t do well for me is the connection with banks.

    A bit of an anecdote, but i was a long-time user of Mint, which integrated with all my banks and credit cards, which was nice.

    When I decided to selfhost, I was disappointed that bank syncing wasn’t a thing, or it had these roundabout ways of working, or they simply didn’t support the banks and credit cards i use.

    So… I ended up wity Money Manager EX.

    Once i did the initial importing of my records, everything since has been manually entered.

    Now, this might seem tedious depending on how many transactions and accounts you manage, but it’s really not.

    Depending on how often you update your records, you can do an easy export/import of your transactions from your bank (usually a csv export). Doing this once a month isn’t terrible.

    I just manually enter all my transactions. Yes, more work, but also less frustration and it makes me feel more in touch with my spending.

    Even not having to worry about the hassle of syncing not working, or having to fix things like that is a huge weight off my shoulders.

    Anyway, just wanted to share my experience because bank syncing shouldn’t be a make-or-break thing.








  • I think it comes down to accuracy, which is what when adding any content to OSM.

    Cycle Routes may have different meaning depending on the location. My municipality seems to mark roads that link to cycling infrastructure as cycling routes, even if they aren’t part of the cycling network (which are considerably more vast and usually expand across multiple municipalities, provinces, or even the country. I think to use “cycle route” for this specific example isn’t accurate.

    “bicycle=designated” has been all over the place from examples I’ve been looking at spanning 100km in either direction. Some mappers seem to only use the “designated” tag on bike paths, while others use them on roads with simple bike lanes. But there’s a lack of consistency, so it’s hard to know who’s right in these situations.

    For me, it makes a lot more sense to use the “designated” tag here, instead of “bicycle=yes” (which applies to 99% of the roads here), or the cycle route tag.

    At the end of the day, I think most (i.e. non-mappers) are interested in how the data actually works for them. For example, can they see this cycling infrastructure on their bike computer, or does it still appear as a regular road because the tags aren’t specific enough? To me, that would be more problematic than a “somewhat accurate” tag. But that’s my opinion.