Once everything is set up properly it just works tbh. Meanwhile in windows updates broke something every other time.

Yes I know degrowth isn’t about population, that’s what I said?

But if population naturally declines, I really don’t think it’s a good idea to try to reverse that trend. Less people means less resources consumed, and better quality of life for those children. Prioritize the people already alive over those that aren’t born. We have more than enough people in the world, and a lot of those people’s potential is not fully reached due to inequality.

Degrowth isn’t just about population, or even about it at all. Degrowth is about doing the opposite of what capitalism forces us to do, infinite growth on a finite planet.

But also, the last thing we should do is incentivize birthing more people. We have increasing amounts of automation technologies, we don’t need more people.

I guess because the Gen Z comp sci students are the people who are truly fluent in computers. We were immersed in the internet and digital technology from a young age, but also had the curiosity to go beneath the surface of them, and get a real understanding of how things work. Most people just use the technology superficially, even if they have grown up with the internet and computers.

But wouldn’t the husband be at fault here either way by conservative standards? It’s infidelity.

Which makes the difference between the AIs and humans lower, likely increasing the significance of the result.

If you read into the study, they also include the pass rates for humans. It’s higher than AIs, but still less than 75%

While I agree it’s a relatively low percentage, not being sure and having people pick effectively randomly is still an interesting result.

The alternative would be for them to never say that gpt-4 is a human, not 50% of the time.

HDR is actually pretty cool, at least when you got a proper HDR display such as an OLED screen

And at the same time believe in a million conspiracy theories in fields that they definitively are not experts in

Yeah, Mozilla is doing good work, and AI is here to stay. It’s all about making and using AI ethically.

Yeah, it’s about as useful as saying that all of science is “just statistics”. Which like, in a literal way, it’s true. But science is still what forms the foundation of our entire civilization and base of knowledge.

Knowing that a blood pressure drug works is “just statistics”, but you still take it if your blood pressure is high.

Nah, it’s just that corporations will obviously want to be as positive as possible! After all, happy people are more exploitable/profitable people!

This is literally how the fake happy cyberpunk dystopias happen.

Genuine question, why is AI bad/concerning?

Give the internet archive a donation, history should be remembered, not forgotten.

Facebook is not the government though?

And why is it always “we have to respect other people calling for the erasure of the rights of minorities”? Do you have any idea how frustrating and tiresome that is, as a minority?

In addition, what if the person noticed the obstructions and then moved them away, and then accidentally got a finger in there? That’s a realistic scenario too.

ACAB as an actual term is a bit more ideological in nature, specifically, in regards to the task the police actually do, which is primarily protect the state and private property, no matter whether it’s good or bad.

If the state tells the police to disrupt a protest about climate change? Then that is their job, and if they don’t do it, they’re effectively not doing what they’re supposed to.

Except you feel this even if you’re in your 20s. It’s not exactly an old thing lol

Hell, even over the last 3 years it’s super obvious

“Politics is everything I disagree with”