SpaceCadet2000

The real power of tmux, though, is that it manages the session you created.
So, one use case would be saving your current terminal setup. Instead of exiting the terminal and navigating to the project and setting up the environment again next time, you can simply detach and re-attach.

systemd: Oh yeah? Hold my beer

I get the feeling we are now talking about two different things. If by “cracked” you mean that someone can rip and redistribute the content once they get access to it, sure, it’s very hard to protect against that.

What I mean is: it’s possible to restrict access to the service so that you cannot watch a video unless you’ve played the ad first or you are a paying customer. As an example: Netflix or any of the movie streaming platforms. There’s no add-on or special browser that allows you to use Netflix without being a paying customer, and if YouTube implements their plan, they can make it so you won’t be able to circumvent it just by using Firefox, like you claimed.

Sure it does. Technically, it’s perfectly feasible to put up an ad-wall.

It also doesn’t have ads, though YouTube could probably theoretically embed the ads in the video itself.

They could also just not let you have the video until you’ve watched the ad.

How will that help if they block you server side?

test

asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Technically, Lemmy could go the same way. Even though it’s an free software project, @ljdawson doesn’t own the Lemmy trademark. I think it would be prudent to call it “Sync for Lemmy”.

Also, the name change from “Reddit Sync” to “Sync for Reddit” happened long enough ago that people are probably more familiar with the new name,

Not sure if works well

You can check if something appears on https://iknowwhatyoudownload.com/

ssh tunneling can be very useful for testing or one-shot things where you quickly need access to a service that’s not directly reachable, but I wouldn’t use it as a permanent solution for anything. You quickly run into problems like:

• TLS certificates don’t work, so you get into the habit of clicking through security warnings or turning of TLS validation altogether.
• Virtual hosts don’t work
• Port conflicts when you want to access the same type of service on different remote machines, so you have to remap them and remember things like: localhost:8080 is foo:80 and localhost:8081 is bar:80
• If it’s not your infrastructure (i.e. you are an employee in a larger company), you are probably bypassing all kinds of security rules by exposing a service and your security guys will not be too happy about it if they find out.

It would have been perfectly possible to charge a different rate for AI harvesting than for Reddit Apps.

I general why does there have to be static sidebars that are rarely used. It causes the content body to be squeezed into tiny space.

I think the rationale is that most people use widescreen monitors nowadays, so if you allow the content part to run across the entire width of the screen, it becomes ugly and hard to read. Therefore the middle section gets a limited or fixed width, which in turn then creates two empty columns to the sides that designers are then tempted to fill up with “useful” stuff.

You can try this yourself: paste a long line of text into a notepad window and maximize the window. It is much harder on your eyes to read and focus on the text than if you resized the window to a more reasonable width where the text gets broken up into several lines.

I’m not against this design paradigm per se, but the content width reduction is often overdone, leading to a squeezed feeling like you say. It can also create problems if you have a habit of not using maximized browser windows, but for example a window tiled to one half of the screen. Some of the better sites work around this by having a reactive design that reduces, collapses or removes the sidebars when the window is narrower than a certain width, but many sites don’t.

He’s just a bit chubbier. He got packaged as a flatpak.