No it’s just a 1U server. It does mean that the next 3U over the server can’t be fully used (switches would probably clear). That server pretty much replaced my whole stack except for my NAS so I had space available.

Happy to know my redneck engineering made you laugh! It was either that or a custom water loop.

It’s also way more quiet than those damn pesky 1U fans and I had the space available in my rack

It is true for raid 5 & 6. Raid 0, 1, and 10 are supposed to be production ready. I use raid 10 only with btrfs, anything else and I use zfs or mdadm.

My only gripe with btrfs is that I’ve had systems come down from a single drive failure in raid quite “often” when compared to other FS.

ZFS is a ram hog but I always could do a live resilvering without downtime.

Any evidence of that? Genuinely curious as I can’t really find anything about them being by the same people and forgefed started as mailed-based prior to forgejo existing.

edit: seems like they are funded by different organizations and the main contributors to forgefed never worked on forgejo, they worked on vervis though.

Just to give credit where credit is due, git federation is a Forgefed Initiative

Forgejo is implementing it in their platform.

Sorry that’s all I could think about

One of the first interaction I witnessed from the forgejo guys was this PR:

https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/27455/

The interaction and stubbornness of earl-warren felt like it was just that, provoked drama.

I use owncloud infinite scale and overall its rock solid. The downside is the lack of plugins. Nextcloud has been nothing but trouble for me and every update was a mess so I decided to try OCIS and for my need I was extremely satisfied.

Now, I admit, I’m not one to get carried by the drama in the FOSS sphere (still use Gitea) but I do agree there is an history to the separation of owncloud and nextcloud that can make some people uncomfortable. Having a choice is good I believe.

Should have been called Lignux.

tar -h

Edit: wtf… It’s actually tar -?. I’m so disappointed

Have full root access to my machine, still broke. What am I doing wrong?

100kg will always feel like 100kg, it just moves faster.

Yep, my homelab started with a laptop (includes a ups!) And as the years went on I build larger and larger. Now that I manage a full rack, I miss my laptop.

I’ll say that as someone who stopped using docker and went back to deploying from source in lxc containers: dockers is a great tool for the majority of people and that is exactly what it aims to be, easily reusable in as many different setups as possible.

On the flip side, yes it may happen that you would not benefit from docker for a reason or another. I don’t, in my case docker only adds another layer over my already containerized setup and many of the services I deploy are already built from source in a CI/CD workflow and deployed through ansible.

I do have other issues with docker but those are usually less with the tool and more with how some project use docker as a mean to replace proper deployment documentations.

I hate you, congrats!

In Canada we have to give our firstborn to a telecommunication monopoly for somewhat OK internet.

Btrfs also allows for mixed size drive. It’s the reason why I use it

Edit: autocorrect

The producer and publisher paid a cost for you to have heard and develop an interest in their products. So yes, it makes a difference to them if that investment turns into you using the content but not paying for it. You’re suddenly a target audience without returns.