• 2 Posts
  • 40 Comments
Joined 24 days ago
cake
Cake day: May 14th, 2026

help-circle
  • For $10, that’s quite impressive. I’m familiar with several of those games, including Just Cause 2, which I have run on i5-4785t (iGPU only) at 630p, hitting 69fps (albeit it AA off etc, AF 4x, textures high, shadows low, medium water and object details etc).

    OTOH, the i5-4785T doesn’t hit 90+ degrees to do it :) (sits around 70) and sips ~40W.

    EDIT: from the video, the test rig was -

    Test Bench Specs: • CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 @ 3.8GHz OC • RAM: 8GB DDR2 • GPU: ATI Radeon HD 3850 512MB • Storage: 1TB SATA SSD • PSU: 450W 80+ Bronze • OS: Windows 7 x64












  • Quite a lot, actually.

    Coding, document analysis, STT, home assistant, shopping assistant, gaming, journalling, image and video generation, OCR, language translation, recipe/meal / workout planning, study/flashcard generation, email drafting, adversarial review, search engine on steroids, hardware troubleshooter, companion for elder care, music curator and DJ …

    All of that without creepy ass cloud shit from Big AI.

    I can go on, but “a lot” probably covers it.

    EDIT: asked, answered and…down voted. Classic Lemmy anti-ai knee jerk. FWIW I work with AI in healthcare settings as well as code review for my own personal projects.

    What I said are actual use cases, not a wishlist generated by Jippity. I can elaborate on any and all of them with actual real life experience.




  • I mean…that entirely depends on your use case - and I hate saying that. For me and what I do, Qwen SLM (esp Qwen3-4B 2507 instruct and Qwen3.5-2B) are exceptional. But I’m not trying to do Claude at home.

    Best bet? Spend $10 on OpenRouter and try different models. In a head to head with ChatGPT 5.4 mini (excellent for coding BTW), I’ve found Qwen 3.5 27B more than able to hold its own for coding tasks…IF you narrowly gate it/confine it. The last batch of Qwen’s really are something. Dunno about the 3.7 series.

    Having said ALL that, I’m really tempted to go back in time and code myself a deterministic expert system, with user updatable knowledge cascade, tool calling and a minimal amount of Markov chain word garnish for flavour. I think we use to just call that “a program” lol.

    Really tempted actually, because if 50% of llm use case is basically Super Google but not shit…well, I can make that myself. I just need to point my autism at it.

    PS: this might help

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0AqpaFm11oI



  • Just for sake of completion

    https://piwigo.org/

    Pros

    Mature project (around since the early 2000s)

    Lightweight compared to Immich

    Designed as a photo library first, not an AI platform

    Albums, tags, metadata, permissions

    Huge plugin ecosystem

    Runs happily on modest hardware

    Can manage very large collections

    Doesn’t demand phone-app-centric workflows (though of course it has a phone to computer app / sync)

    Cons

    Feels more like a traditional photo archive than Google Photos

    Mobile experience is functional rather than slick

    No fancy AI search or face recognition by default (though can add easy enough)

    UI is a bit “classic web”





  • There’s an argument to be had regarding a MoE versus a small dense model. I guess it depends on what exactly you need doing with it. I would be tempted to run a smaller dense model (like a Qwen 3-14B or a Qwen 3.5 9B) as at a reasonable quant, it might fit mostly or entirely on the GPU, thereby giving you excellent speeds.

    PS: I’m actually in the process of designing an expert system (not a LLM) for pretty much the task you described. The intention is that you would still interact with it like a large language model, but the actual brains underneath it would be something more traditional.