It worked for Wal-Mart

Which isn’t really a sustainable business model, but it’s quite successful

in the end, IT is by definition always something administrative rather than actually productive

Lol, what?

Might as well say mechanics are administrative too

Out of tens of millions of children, that’s nothing. It was pure fear mongering

probably SSL

*TLS

SSL has been deprecated for a decade at this point

Anonymous data sources are largely a myth. The idea you can have large sets of data remain anonymous is unrealistic. Once you have enough data points, it’s easy to de-anonymize almost any individual

The FBI agrees with you

(Although they have since taken down their PSA woth no explanation)

I don’t know why I do this to myself, but I read through Meta’s disclosure

Every single lobbyist I looked at worked in DC before becoming a lobbyist. I knew it happened a lot, but it’s really depressing to see

Also, why do these disclosures not require companies to specify how the money was spent? There are only ~20 different lobbyists mentioned, and Meta spent 7.6M in a single quarter

ByteDance has a lot of money. Trump likes money. Trump’s only leverage over ByteDance is allowing TikTok, so he’ll do that in exchange for money

Zuckerberg and Meta are much more centralized in the US, which gives Trump far more options in terms of what he can offer them. Trump will give Zuckerberg something else to placate him. Probably lots of cheap H-1B labor

Sam was fired because the board stated he withheld information and misinformed them, not because he was a bad CEO