Not really. It is the tolerance paradox.
Banning slavery might be authoritarian but it is less authoritarian than allowing it. So on the political scale, banning slavery is anti-authoritarian and allowing it is authoritarian.
Not really. It is the tolerance paradox.
Banning slavery might be authoritarian but it is less authoritarian than allowing it. So on the political scale, banning slavery is anti-authoritarian and allowing it is authoritarian.
I think it is a bit unfair to give you shit for your question.
it is normal to confuse authoritarian system with restrictions of freedom. Because generally that is how it works. But not in this case…
Because it is the paradox of tolerance all over again. Technically it is authoritarian to ban slavery but it would be more authoritarian to allow it as people would own people… So on the scale of how authoritarian an action is, banning slavery is as anti-authoritarian as it gets and allowing slavery is as authoritarian as it gets. (Of course, a world without slavery and without any rules would be less authoritarian but… I think we know better than trying that with slavery)
I hope this helps in actually understanding the reason instead of being told what it is.
E.g. it is a reality that there is currently some correlations between race and e.g. poverty. Even we don’t consider those correlations when enacting laws, we create unjust laws that impact some races more than others, which would feedback into those correlations.
Extremely stupid example for. CT (critical theory in general), if your government would enact a law that would state that the government would build you your dream house for 5 millions. Even if it is more expensive than 5 million. Then “everyone” can get their dream house on paper, but in reality only the rich can get it and they get additional wealth that the general public would have to cover. Impoverishing the poor more and enrich the wealthiest more. So an unjust law.
Well, I would love if that concept could be retired and forgotten sooner than later. But as things are right now, e.g. CRT is required to get there and CRT requires the concept of race :/
I think the biggest flaw is the name.
energy would be used by the Linux guys. That energy is probably equal or less than what the turbine produces. That makes it not a perpetual motion machine. It is free energy for the owner though as long as the speakers don’t consume too much energy as the Linux guys will come and for free to no cost of the owner
I hope these aren’t real. I, and most people here, could probably write these codes top to bottom on paper without an eraser or strikethrough parts because we have it fully solved before the interviewer finished the sentence.
Jk rolling made some really strange decisions. Some of it really makes you wonder if maybe she was being a little too honest or just too unaware to see the implications.
I just did and some of the stuff is wild. Not gonna quote or reference anything for my account safety, don’t ask.
Sorry mate, you drunk the Koolaid. I hope you will see the much sadder reality of who he is and what he does, because you will learn to spot some well crafted propaganda.
Not a criticism of you but a little fun fact about him for others, he has a bunch of friends who “aren’t” Nazis but calling themselves or have friends who like to call themselves stuff like “race realist”.
I will start to call chrome/iums limited web browser from now on
I kinda get the female orgasm thing like woman were shamed for anything remotely sexual and I guess a lot or even most women tried to hide anything and everything. Obviously men didn’t learned or cared about pleasure for the wife, even if they truly would love and adore them and would be willing to enjoy it together. But of course, a lot of, or even most men were fucking toxic shit bags.
Not saying it isn’t ridiculous but like there is some stupid feedback shit.
Clitoris denial just seems random to me
There are clitoris deniers? How? Like porn is everywhere, you don’t even need to find someone anymore. You need to be able to read or understand history or even basic science. You just need to be able to exist online.
While I love the meme, Linux is doing pretty good recently
Just In case, I wasn’t clear, I am just relaying the argument as I understood it
Following an ideal while being based on free labor is difficult
It doesn’t seem to be a debate. “Microkernels are better” “yes but I don’t have the time for it” but thanks
Thanks! I will look into
I have heard that before in a joke setting, I would love to hear genuine arguments for and against it.
You are learning which is great.