• 2 Posts
  • 25 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 19th, 2023

help-circle
  • The bad news is that Android is still likely affected. Similar to Apple’s ImageIO, Android has a facility called the BitmapFactory that handles image decoding, and of course libwebp is supported. As of today, Android hasn’t released a security bulletin that includes a fix for CVE-2023-4863 – although the fix has been merged into AOSP. To put this in context: if this bug does affect Android, then it could potentially be turned into a remote exploit for apps like Signal and WhatsApp. I’d expect it to be fixed in the October bulletin.

    So a no-click device hack?



  • Do you have lots of cash to support the copyright and maintenance fees? The Web archive (I think, or another similar website) got sued for having knowledge and book contents on their website. You can’t just publish hacked books.

    Most likely you would need a way to generate money for a “business”.

    There would be some ways like advertising (can be OK, but not always the best, it depends on how many adds, how scummy ads, and how much tracking/data selling).

    Donations? = pretty much no expected revenue. The amount of revenue you can get is very low.

    Paid features, but what features could be paid while keeping free access?



  • On the website :

    Wireguard is clearly seen by firewalls as a VPN by only allowing UDP packets

    However proton Vpn în their app, they have a “wireguard TCP” setting.

    Which is also confusing as on their wireguard marketing page, there is a faq where they say openvpn supports tcp in a ways as it supports TCP but not wireguard.


  • Because it doesn’t show the conspiracy theory enhancing the authors conspiracy anti-covid/anti-moon landing opinion :

    meaning you will never find the truth about the moon landing or COVID vaccines there even if the query asks for exactly that. What you will find - though - is a bunch of irrelevant “fact check” or “science loving” sites, or ones shitting on “conspiracy theorists”.





  • Well companies could still be liches. If what they are building around your software isn’t a direct derivative (which it will most likely not be), then companies will still be able to publish their closed source work, while mentioning your open source software (if they even need to).

    They benefit from your code and give nothing in return.

    This can also be true if the companies use your software without redistributing it. They will just use your software and never give anything back.






  • I recently found Liftoff on android from the posts on Lemmy, and I like some of the features (in addition to the common text features) :

    • the ability to have multiple accounts views at the same time.
    • being able to add instances without accounts just to get the all/local content from them.
    • nice design.

    However I find it is also lacking :

    • there are inconsistencies between how comments and posts are managed in the notification/account view (to open a comment I need to click on the “link” 🔗 button, but to open a post I can just click on it)
    • it doesn’t yet have verified links like Jerboa, so when something puts and https instead of ! Link to a community/post, it always opens in a browser.
    • I would also like to be able to have a setting where it is a “always ask what account to use” for subscriptions. If I found an interesting community on my alt account, I would want to subscribe to it with my main.

  • Favourite, not sure. Maybe my “favourite” would be the one which would be the hardest to replace with something I like.

    There wouldn’t be something i can think off that could be irreplaceable. However the hardest thing I like may be FanControl.

    For the browser, Firefox is very nice, but it’s “just” a browser if you think about it. There is brave, and other open source chromium alternatives if it disappears.

    For mail clients, I also like the Mailspring design, however Thunderbird just got a new skin and damn it looks good too.

    And for the rest, I don’t really know. Either I don’t remember right now, or no special “like” for the software. Or I like the closed source software convenience more (I may also have no idea of an open source alternative, or an equivalent in features open source).

    It depends on the usage really.



  • This wouldn’t happen because you don’t feel a temperature. You feel an energy/heat transfer.

    When you touch something cold, it’s cold because when you touch it, there is a transfert of heat from your hands to the cold object.

    If you touch something hot, it’s hot because there is a transfer of heat from the object to your hands.

    In a hot room, it’s a transfer of heat from the air to you.

    But there is something more too.

    You generate heat. If you were in a room with exactly the temperature of your skin, it will feel hot, because the heat you generate cannot dissipate in the air.

    Now let’s say you touch the liquid which has no energy transfer capabilities. In such way, well, you wouldn’t be able to touch it.

    But say we could. Your hands won’t feel immediately any heat/cold because there cannot be any energy/heat transfer. However, as you generate heat, your hands will start to get hotter and hotter has the heat cannot be dissipated around, even if your body will try to compensate though other parts of the body. It’s like putting your hands in a glove.

    Also remove your other duplicate comments.



  • It’s not always easy to combine the different requirements for those companies.

    Some companies have trackers/advertising in their software. In that case, puting them open source would mean that everyone would see the code and be unhappy about the adverts.

    Another issue is pirating. Open sourcing the code could maybe allow easier pirating, either by removing the trackers/adverts or by just not buying the software.

    Managers can also not know, or not care about open source.

    Another issue is that open sourcing it in a way where someone can modify it, may create issues with some people trying to redistribute the software, even if the licence doesn’t allow that, which would create more legal work for those companies.