![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
This is an article from 2021 about a book researched in 2019.
This is an article from 2021 about a book researched in 2019.
Not really. They just removed unprompted nag. If you’re not constantly keeping a hand on the wheel and looking at the road, it nags more and will pull you over if you ignore it.
If you turn off the internal driver monitoring camera, you can’t engage FSD or even use lane assist.
Well said.
Yeah, and like in my own example, it’s easily clarified by simply saying Jane’s parents were concerned that Jane may harm theirself.
Over and beyond gendered pronouns, the overwhelming amount of confusing sentences I read aren’t confusing because of genderless pronouns. They’re confusing because they’re poorly written.
Even then, whether “them” references a group or an individual is left unclear–as I noted. E.g., “you” vs “y’all.” Exclusively using they/them is mildly less precise, but people acting like it’s the end of the English language is silly.
As I also explicitly stated, acting like it’s not slightly imprecise is facile. It could be worse, at least English doesn’t have gendered nouns like Spanish, Italian, etc. 😁
They went with them and then they decided to take off and took them with them, so we met up with some friends and then got together with them even though they didn’t join because they ultimately wanted to go home.
It’s less precise. That’s just a problem with English though. That said, just using people’s names more often isn’t that big of a deal and using gender neutral pronouns otherwise is, similarly, not hard and not a big deal. Nevertheless, I was referring to seven different distinct individuals in the above.
He went with her, but then she decided to take off and took him with her, so we met up with some friends and then got together with him though she didn’t want to join because he ultimately wanted to go home.
It’s still confusing, and the sentence is absurd, but you can get a better sense of how many people are involved with gendered pronouns. But no one talks that way, contextual clues would make it more obvious, and we’d use proper names in many of those instances by habit for clarification. That said, it would be easier if we just used a number-word in place of a pronoun. Thone, thwo, theree, thour, etc or something. Then we could refer to whom we mean with a numbered-pronoun to indicate agents. That would be the clearest way to differentiate agents in a sentence.
And to be very clear, I have no problem using non-gendered pronouns, but the idea that it isn’t slightly less precise is facile. But, again, only slightly. And who cares if it makes people more comfort and seen?
Steve Mnuchin.
You just answered your own question lol
I think they were just angry because the Rivian isn’t designed for Supercharging and so was parked sideways across two parking spots.
I like the Bose open ear buds, which is similar insofar as you can still hear everything around you, but it’s not bone conduction. They basically cling to your ear and are just a small driver near your ear canal.
I like the sound and fit better than any bone conduction headphones I’ve tried, but I don’t use these styles for swimming, which is the main advantage of bone conduction. For running, cycling, and just generally walking around in the world the Bose work great. For sitting and sound isolation, I use corded cans.
I also fall asleep with one or both on periodically because they’re so innocuous. I roll like a log in water when I sleep, so they unclip at some point in the night, but they’ve never caused me and discomfort. I forget I’m wearing them most of the time.
You could fit 16 Netherlands into Texas. Lol
Lol. Responds to a post about a state by comparing it to a continent.
A full loop around Jupiter is 70,000 km.
Jupiter is not small.
I meant about your preferences.
Who cares?
“They”? Which shop? When? Was that part of contract negotiation/positioning or an actual demand?
“Lest we forget the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history… the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom."
Yeah you’re right, I guess all the gains they’ve made don’t matter because of your shitty experience. Thanks for your wisdom.
You’re 23 and live with your dad. What shop are you a member of that was enforcing 10-hour work days?
Labor unions are the Satan to which you are referring. Labor unions brought you many infernal things: the weekend, lunch breaks, paid vacation, social security, minimum wage, FMLA, 8-hour work days, OSHA, sick leave, child labor laws, etc.
Satan indeed!
Read the development notes from the first years of any technology you use. The research you’re “referencing” is six years old at this point.
What’s next? You going to criticize an iPod Nano to make a point about the broken screen on your iPhone 8? Criticize Google assistant from 2019 to harangue OpenAI?
Look at what six years of development means: https://youtu.be/qTDlRLeDxxM?si=dFZzLcO_a8wfy2QS