![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/a18b0c69-23c9-4b2a-b8e0-3aca0172390d.png)
People need to expect to pay for art and entertainment. People should. It’s immoral and unethical to not pay for art and expect art to be there.
People need to expect to pay for art and entertainment. People should. It’s immoral and unethical to not pay for art and expect art to be there.
Which one would you suggest to review?
As a newer developer is has been amazing for me and alot of experienced developers also recognize how much benefit it provides so im honestly confused by your standpoint.
If you’re not actively using AI for a tech job then you’re leaving yourself behind. It’s look ignoring using Google.
Yeah I don’t know if the board getting ousted is good for anyone but open ai
The whole purpose of the board is to provide a safety valve. If the CEO is hiding stuff from the board then that seems like a completely legitimate reason to throw out a CEO. It’s hard to be a safety valve when the CEO is actively hiding information from the board to make the decisions they need to make.
You’re such a dick for no reason. It definitely bolsters your claims your an old school tech guy lol
Is this speculation or do you have proof they are giving products away to inflate a bubble?
They can’t live for very long. It’s why I kinda think this work is somewhat unethical - even if it brings about breakthroughs that could help millions.
Okay so what I’m hearing is you want companies to make investments in artists directly - so a form of profit sharing essentially. Why would a company invest in artists if artists get all of the profits when its successful and the company loses all of the capital if it fails? Why would any business want to partake in a system like that?