

Here’s the most of my playlist called YM2612:

Guess I’ll save this thread for later >:)


Here’s the most of my playlist called YM2612:

Guess I’ll save this thread for later >:)
Nope, the point of this bank is that it’s mobile only. No offices, no webapp.


Why did they use a screenshot of Chrome from, like, Win XP times?
I honestly don’t have any definitive evidence that it’s AI generated. The closes I have is the weird-ass ports on the laptop that also change slightly with every AI edit the author made. Somehow I can just always tell if something is generated. Besides the stylistic tells, it has a vibe of non-human decisions to it. Like that panel with Reddit people, it’s just… wrong somehow?
500+ upvotes on an AI-generated meme on Lemmy?
Fascinating.
The only conclusion I can make is that “Linux good” > “AI bad”.
GTAO is pretty fun if you carefully dupe money all the time. I come back to it occasionally.


Not if you’re on mobile :(
(I mean the design, not loading speeds)


I always do that Neo dodge, but we all know how that ended.


Mostly, people with friends.


Wtf is “whatnot”? How is it amongst such well-known stuff (except Instructure, too, I guess)?


I’m aware of slash commands. If it’s a /sarcasm command, why would it be at the end of the statement?
What’s your source for this? I’m pretty sure “/s” means “end of sarcasm”, borrowed from XML/HTML.


Just fyi, the slash in /s or /sarcasm isn’t some weird bracket, it’s meant as an XML style closing tag, meaning “end of sarcasm”. In full it would look as follows:
<sarcasm>Things are going great!</sarcasm>
But people drop the opening tag and the <> for convenience.
They’ve got a lot of distros to try out, y’know?
Reinstalling Windows is a generations-honored ritual.
Nowadays there are several tools where you tick options and do it in one click.
I saw list item 1 more as “I want my phone to last for 5+ years, so I will want to replace my battery eventually”, rather than “I wanna wreck my battery fast, so it better be replaceable”. Being wasteful with your battery like that goes against the spirit of Fairphone, IMO.
2.5 years isn’t that long to evaluate battery degradation IMO, and as you said, you mostly don’t even push your battery that hard. And the article even seems to imply that faster charging does impact battery life, it’s just that manufacturers consider 100w a sweet-spot between charging speed and battery degradation.
Surely, that impacts the battery longevity, right? Personally, I disable all fast-charging features and charge my phone overnight.
P.S. Sorry for calling you Shirley.
Why do you need 120 watts charging for a phone? Most laptops don’t even support 100w.
RomM sounds like a much better option.