I have to say, as a Linux fan in the 90’s it was very cool to see Linux eating the whole server space, replacing older Unix while Microsoft tried desperately to grow Windows on the server market.
I have to say, as a Linux fan in the 90’s it was very cool to see Linux eating the whole server space, replacing older Unix while Microsoft tried desperately to grow Windows on the server market.
Communication is encrypted, it’s https.
I have that in my ICE car and I never use it (map of gas stations correlated with remaining fuel). That’s not specific to an EV.
Any of those features can be in a smartphone attached to your dashboard. Sure you have some benefits in accessing the car data, but they are small.
Unfortunately boring distributions don’t get recommended because users of boring distributions don’t bother commenting on distribution discussions.
And it’s really unfortunate that obscure distributions have more vocal fans, because boring distributions are much better for beginners.
Use Firefox if you want but don’t donate to Mozilla. Money doesn’t go to Firefox development anyway.
Also if they can afford to pay their CEO $3 millions a year, they don’t need your donations.
It’s probably replacing garbage written by humans that nobody was reading either.
So in this case, garbage content that nobody reads, AI is probably a good idea.
Read the article. Her mom agreed to it, and they set rules. It’s after that that it went bad.
For a desktop yes. You can dock it and forget that it’s not a regular Linux desktop. Especially if it means Python and JS, you don’t need much power for that.
For a laptop not so much, because you’ll need to bring screen+keyboard+mouse and everything to plug them so the portability aspect seriously suffers.
I’m not sure what “the Linux community” really means but I would bet that pure open source Android based on AOSP are more popular than the non-Android Linux mobile OS combined.
It’s still a lot of work, for what value compared to an OS based on AOSP?
I just don’t like Linus because he’s annoying and abuses clickbait thumbnails and titles.
Some of their videos (from other people than himself) are good, but usually I’ll avoid LTT content all together.
For that reason I’m not really sure what happened, and I don’t really care.
10 years ago it was “how do we convince Google to buy this company?”
And it was overpriced. I can see people buying a useless toy for 50 bucks, but not for $700.
In some languages (like French) “I wonder” is said like “I ask myself”. So I think it’s a translation mistake.
Yes that part is clear, but the question is about the collateral damage on legitimate usage.
Especially coming from Google, who was one of the good guys pushing open standards and interoperability.
There is also the issue of determining if a given image is real or AI. If AI were legal, that means prosecution would need to prove images are real and not AI with the risk of letting go real offenders.
The need to ban AI CSAM is even clearer than cartoon CSAM.
Crypto currencies doesn’t mean “hidden currency”, it means currency based on cryptography.
They asked her already and she refused.
I don’t hate Windows, I don’t care about it. I don’t use it.