It’s not quite equivalent right? Using an existing plant is cheaper and faster than building a new one?
Its like saying a datacenter is not financially viable only because top brass decided to use a perfectly good existing one.
It’s not quite equivalent right? Using an existing plant is cheaper and faster than building a new one?
Its like saying a datacenter is not financially viable only because top brass decided to use a perfectly good existing one.
It’s tough when people like us sit here online and bicker at people for not doing their jobs… when we can see they are literally overwhelmed by an avalanche of attack from rightwing douchebags who have infinite resources and infinite bootlickers to mindlessly repeat propaganda.
So it’s morally fine for assholes to pay money and buy up rights to creative works and deprive people of enjoyment just because their imaginary concept of ownership trumps ours?
Sounds illegal. You can’t sign away your rights in contracts. Wasn’t there also a recent law that banned Non-competes?
Because that’s usually the cheapest part that manufacturers can get away with cheapening iut further.
(I am not the person you replied to)
The problem with this argument is that you are ruling out entire countries for the acts of corrupt governments. Thing is there is no such thing as a clean government. Everybody has skeletons in their closet.
Here’s why:
Boards of directors are CEOs of other companies that are buddies of the CEO of the company they are directors of. This is like a shitty musical chair of board of directors.