Hiding a camera in person would be actively malicious if the other party doesn’t know. Having a zoom recording leaked is less actively.
Hiding a camera in person would be actively malicious if the other party doesn’t know. Having a zoom recording leaked is less actively.
Does it actually improve the pairing experience? I am skeptical it will make any difference.
So is Voyager (also on fdroid, but is just a pwa) and its miles ahead of the native Lemmy UI.
You can definitely ‘chat’ with copilot, like other llms as well as the inline editor auto complete.
I have been able to live with everything else, but this is the one that kills me every time.
Yeah. That post has over 900 comments, which is rare even for an Ars article. Mostly negative sentiment, which I get.
I wonder if this is something that will help bring Firefox usage numbers up to what they should be. Since so many Firefox users are privacy focused and resist fingerprinting, a lot of users don’t show up in usage numbers. Maybe there aren’t enough of them to make a difference, I don’t know. Thus is the only non-nefarious usage I could think up.
The OP discusses exactly a solution to the anyone setting up an instance to capture the data, because the users home instance federates their votes anonymously.
There maybe flaws in it, not that’s exactly what it aims to solve.
This is the main thing preventing me, and probably a good amount of other folks, from using alternative roms. If I can get all the apps I need to run, then I can’t use the rom, even if I would prefer it.
Not seeing it on f-droid yet.
I do not like this prediction, because it seems like a plausible reality. Which would be awful.
Regarding obsolete models, that’s only partially true. There’s loads of content that are effectively “finished” and won’t be changing, and will grow obsolete at a fairly slow pace. Meaning they’ll be useful in the models once trained for years.
Obviously new technology and similar ideas/content that didn’t exist when the model was created won’t be there, but the amount that changes and or is new is relatively small each year compared to all the historical content.
Nah. They will cross licence with the other big players effectively closing the market to anyone they don’t bless.
How’d that work out for them? Answer? Not well. History repeats itself, so here we go!
To them it’s a feature, not a bug.
I was just nodding along, reading your post thinking, yup, agreed. Until I saw there was a PR to fix it that signal ignored, that seems odd and there must be some mitigating circumstances on why they haven’t merged it.
Otherwise that’s just inexcusable.
This is fantastic. Been waiting for this for years.
Had to jump into the Web app to see if it was really there, and it was and worked just like they said it would.
That’s perfectly fine for some things, but for most people letting their browser choice dictate what sites they use is backwards
When its not optional to publish email only, the proposed solution is pretty reasonable imo.