thanks for clarifying! that’s really helpful!
thanks for clarifying! that’s really helpful!
haha nice. I’ll try that next time
gotcha, thanks for clarifying :)
“NOPE” as in “not a dark pattern” or as in “I’m not touching this site”? if former, can you clarify on the reason?
can you clarify on the 7?
thanks for confirming my suspicion. as for your question, conda in general is good for installing non-python binaries when needed, and managing env. I don’t use anaconda but it provides a good enough interface for beginners and folks without much coding experience. It’s usually the easiest to use that than other variants for them, or the python route of setting up environments
If you’ve never worked before, this can be considered practice runs for the when you do.
Like one of the other commentors said, assume everything is accessible by Google and/or your university (and later, your boss, company, organization, …).
And not just you, but the people who interact with you through it. So that means you may be able to put up defenses, but if they don’t (and they most likely do not), the data that you interact with them would likely be accessible as well.
So here are some potential suggestions to minimize private-data access by Google/university while still being able to work with others (adjust things depending on your threat model of course):
sounds like this can be a plot of a new Pixar movie
care to elaborate on the possibilities of “really big” that you’re imagining?
Based on this reddit comment, that website is not affiliated with the magic-wormhole
CLI tool
Backend of this is OpenAI / LLM; so my guess is if OP knows what they want, they can prompt such models or chatbots in such a manner to achieve the desired styles.
re: your last point, AFAIK, the TLDR bot is also not AI or LLM; it uses more classical NLP methods for summarization.
Do we know whether federated content (say from Lemmy or Mastodon) with these sites may be under the deal as well?
re 1: out of curiosity, do you encounter dnsleaks when using wireguard?
re 4: you can also check out https://starship.rs/, which helps configure shell prompt very intuitively with a toml file.
Hold up, are you sure you can’t view Discussions or Wiki? Which sites can you not view them?
I’m fine viewing them for public repos that I usually visit.
Asking to make sure that Github is not slowly rolling out this lockdown.
Reminds me of this article https://www.alexmurrell.co.uk/articles/the-age-of-average where the author pulls in different examples of designs and aesthetics converging to some “average”.
I’m feeling conflicted with these trends, on one hand it seems like things are becoming more accessible, while on another, feels like a loss.
This especially may be relevant with generative AI - at least for the very few generative arts I look at, at some point they start to feel the same, impersonal.
They don’t seem to allow account deletions. Does it mean that this could include accounts that they still keep but people don’t use their services anymore?
Something like this, unless they know the root cause (I didn’t read the paper so not sure if they do), or something close to it, may still be exploitable.
I’ve never had an account with these. Do I need to create an account with them to freeze my credits? And what kinds of information should I give / not give when I do?