The corporate adoption on uutils already started.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/core-utils/overview
Windows is now using uutils for their coreutils. I want to see if Microsoft gives back anything to the project with that permissive license. Also, aren’t canonical and Microsoft partners or something? I saw the Ubuntu wsl news.
Check this out. The Hurd is just a collection of translators, which are kinda like fuse. https://gitlab.com/AlmuHS/hurd-translator-in-rust
The GNU Hurd. Keep laughing, it will get there.
Edit: instead of outright promoting the GNU Hurd, I will give my reasons.
The architecture of the Hurd is very scalable compared to other kernels. It does not need much rewriting to adapt to modern technology. Rewriting the Hurd in rust is much easier than other kernels.
It is a GNU project so if it does succeed, we can spread the Free software philosophy to others. It also means that corpo’s cannot influence it.
It is GPLv2 or later, so that is nice to have.
It holds all the benefits of a microkernel.
There is probably more, but they are not as important to me personally.
Is it still considered strong copyleft if it is similar to the GPL then?
Never use tor with a VPN because it can make you easier to identify on the tor network.
Edit: https://support.torproject.org/tor-browser/general/vpn-with-tor/
Also, it is only fine to use a VPN with tor if you know what you are doing.
Is it me, or is it kinda of odd that nixOS did not go full on nix with the init system? For example, setting up service with nix. Obviously systemd is fine for for me (please do not flame me systemd haters), but I wonder if the nix team thought of this idea.
Do you know about the LGPL license? I think it allows you to statically link proprietary code, and the LGPL code remains open while the closed code remains closed. Modified and distributed lgpl still remain under the LGPL.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Lesser_General_Public_License