Did they call a contact that was in you ICE list by chance? Most people understand how that works these days.

Because they’re more mainstream, people have them, and using your phone number (which is easy to get around) doesn’t mean your texts can be read. Privacy and security aren’t the same thing.

That’s always been the case, and why privacy advocates have always said to use PIN/Patterns and not fingerprints and face unlock as police have the legal rights to your prints and face when under arrest. Sad this guy had to bring it to that level, shame on his lawyer that it went that far, it’s always been a 5th amendment argument that’s always stood in the past.

Over reacting, if you’re going to use computers and the internet, it’s literally the exact same thing. How much data you leak is 100% up to your practices, and of course phone choice. If you get a Pixel and run Graphene on it, you’re base is great. Beyond that, app choices become the next threat. Don’t use privacy invading apps you can’t trust, don’t give up data on the phone that you wouldn’t on a computer, then you can protect privacy as much as you can, while still being realistic and living normally.

The biggest hurdle is simply being aware of the threats you’re up against and how to mitigate them. 100% privacy isn’t a realistic goal. Minimizing the leaks and making it very difficult to connect the dots is a far more realistic plan.

It is, as it is in every major country on the planet. If something is truly deemed a threat to national security, rule book goes out the window. Problem is, when what constitutes a “national security threat” starts becoming vague.

No, one, you’ve firewalled the camera, second, the play services on Graphene are userland apps, theirs no special privilege there, and theres the hardened sandboxing on top of that.

While there are legitimate ways for apps to share even in the sandboxed environment (there needs to be for phones to work correctly) you can see those permissions in the apps and also must grant them. Remember, the biggest threat is in a normal situation where the play services have root access, which isn’t the case with Graphene. Surprisingly enough, most of the Google apps have minimal permissions and usually near no trackers other than analytics that most are blocking by default with DNS anyways.

The Pi’s aren’t very powerful, mini PCs are very cheap these days, I do just that with Jellyfin for years and it’s been great.

Problem is, it’s not! Every loophole they needed was built into HIPAA from the start. Most would be very surprised how much is allowed to show to people that aren’t your doctor.

they’re not even trying to do it effectively

Of course they’re not, because they’re smart enough to know they can’t as laws only apply to the people that willingly chose to follow them.

They know damn well that screwing with people, like the 99.99% of people buying Primatine and Bronkaid arent using it to make meth, those people buy kilos of it online and have it shipped to their doorstep, but if they fuck with people that suffer from allergies they get to say they’re doing “something”, and that shuts up the uninformed majority.

If they actually wanted a war on drugs, they could be very effective at it, but they know better. If they actually went through with it, theyd have no rationale to blow billions on useless govt agencies like the DEA. It’s in their best interest to talk the talk, but not walk the walk.

TMO is breached yearly, Mint customers and TMO customers aren’t the same thing, Mint is TMO’s customer, not the individuals. Not the same databases. In the end, Mint doesn’t have half the data on it’s customers that actual TMO does on theirs.

More like realizing how much they were losing, on top of how bad their numbers have been for years…

Not everybody lives their lives based on political cancel culture.

Then you don’t grasp what’s happening, You think the Goog wants to be in the middle of that shit? That’s time and resources that don’t benefit them. Providing that data puts them in a bad spot Everytime, simply not having the data to provide obsoloves them of that and is in both their and the end users best interest. The push getting worse is because current Stingrays don’t work on 5G, so the internal police spying is very limited now, and getting location records from telcos requires more of a papertrail than going to Google and Apple in the past, and when cops are asking for shit they don’t really need, they don’t want to be in the books for it.

Well, no, not really. They’re more private than Google, but have also never had issues in the past with geofence dragonets, and only because of public backlash stopped the idea of digging through people’s gallerys to accuse everybody of being a pedophile. Yes, out of the box Apple (may) be a little better, but their descicions change with the wind, and at least on Android we have control to stop what Google does in most cases vs no options on the Apple side.

That’s a joke right? It has been for a very long time.

Google has always had good privacy and security, it just doesn’t apply to them! Which is the problem.

They do in MA, because we have the right to vehicle telematics data under our right to repair law, which is constantly being fought including by the feds.

It literally says that multiple times. Their UI and “other code” is closed, therefore the browser is NOT open source. Giving the base they started with doesn’t equal a browser, and doesn’t equal you being able to compile the finished product. It’s no more open source than Chrome.

Prize for being overly dramatic!

It literally makes less than zero sense to go from Graphene to e, Graphene is the most hardened privacy tweaked OS available, e would be a huge step backwards on many fronts, what’s your reason for wanting to switch? No, you can’t lock your bootloader with e, verified boot won’t be there, you’ll lose the hardened kernel , the improved sandboxing, the memory protection. It’s a fail from every angle.