Why does it need to run remotely hosted code though?
Why does it need to run remotely hosted code though?
As someone who works on data anonymization, I never trust anonymization.
What’s the behavior before this option was added? Would websites track you or not?
Meanwhile, our lawmakers in the US focus on other/presumed higher priorities.
It’s their interest, not yours.
Only the ‘free’ services. I bet amazon.com won’t ban you from shopping on vpn.
Just avoid using them. Expecting free services without giving out anything is naive.
Why do you think charging stations will be immune? Plus with all the ‘smart’ ‘connected’ cars it’s not impossible for them to push ads directly to your car.
I see. Then it makes sense (just an inconvenience).
so they at least need to know who you are once?
Edit: looks like I misunderstood.
Does this law apply to Apple and Google?
I don’t believe governments are capable of hosting anything securely though.
And they still want your phone number.
Back to Facebook messenger?
Do you mean Tesla?
I don’t disagree with you, nor am I trying to blame people who didn’t know. I didn’t know myself either 20 years ago. I’m just stating a fact and hope people can learn these, and if they still choose one thing over the other, don’t come and cry.
When you chose to use their free service, you already sold your soul to devil.
Agree. But practically they may claim using such data to improve their systems. This is a valid LI justification. But still it provides no benefits to users to whom those data are collected from, while at the same time increases their risks (such as mishandling of their data - which is common since it’s very difficult to handle data 100% correctly).
Legitimate interest is their interest, not yours.
Google is Mozilla’s dad so I’m not sure how long we will be able to use FF with v2.