Do you think I’m talking about inherent value to dogs and cats?
I’m going to assume you are trolling and kick myself for falling for it.
Do you think I’m talking about inherent value to dogs and cats?
I’m going to assume you are trolling and kick myself for falling for it.
I don’t think you understand what inherent means.
If something does not always have value in every circumstance, the value is not inherent.
Pants have value in any climate.
Pants can have value, they do not have inherent value.
You’re looking for particular circumstances that mitigate or otherwise affect the inherent value of certain goods, though your scenarios depend on those goods having inherent value in the first place.
I am pointing out that there are exceptions to the assumption that there is inherent value to show that material goods do not have inherent value. That is the opposite of ‘depending on them having inherent value’.
Pants can be what keeps you from freezing to death and going to jail.
Can be, but pants do not have inherent value in the context of a tropical climate where freezing is not an issue and nudity is allowed. They have contextual value.
Food does not have inherent value, it scales with availability and demand. An excess of apples that will spoil before they can be processed into something that can be consumed do not have inherent value.
This is important because while money’s value is far more volatile, the argument that material goods have inherent value as a comparison is flawed.
Or if you pretended that material goods had an inherent value.
Fewer kids are going to church to learn about who to hate, so I think it balances out.
When Netflix was under $10 I stopped pirating and just watched stuff on Netflix because it was worth it for the convenience at the price point.
That is how they solve piracy. Everything they have been doing over the last couple of years is the reason for the increase in piracy.
A creative interpretation of the firearms policies of 1627.
You remember the government claiming it, but as far as I know they never released any actual statements that his leaks killed anyone.
https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL2N1BR287/
Both of these are pretty typical of all the articles I have seen, which is the government claiming he did great harm, but no actual examples of getting anyone killed.
What people did he get killed?
One is a browser following web standards and the other is a shitty company adding non-standards based development features intended to lock users into there browsers.
It was shitty when Microsoft did the non-standard features to lock in with Internet Exporer and it is shitty that Chrome does it now.
That sounds more like an issue with them using some proprietary browser bullshit than a problem with Firefox.
I just gave you an example of menus not expanding.
I haven’t come across a menu that didn’t expand in Firefox. Which website(s) have this issue in Firefox?
Firefox + uBlock Origin and I have no issues with any websites.
Which ones are you having issues with and what is happening?
Is there a benefit you see for having open tabs instead of bookmarks ready to open when needed?
Google is asking for it so it can use the charbot to create targeted advertising that they can sell to corporations at a higher rate than their current rates.
The primary reasons that multiple attempts have failed for over 100 years! Motors in each wheel could possibly cross the barrier of complexity, but I’m still not expecting this to make it to mass production anytime soon.
Knowing how to do it conceptually and knowing how to do it in mass produced cars is the big thing and I am expecting this to either not be cost effective. Not sure if it will be reliable for over 100k miles, but I expect the cost to limit it to the weird luxury car space at best.
Found the poster who hasn’t been to Alabama.
Making less profit than previous periods of time or even operating at a loss is not illegal in the US. Many companies have periods where they lose money or sacrifice short term profits for long term growth.
Investors with enough control might boot the leadership out, but they can also do that for whatever reason including unrealistic expectations.