And yet they couldn’t extend the same courtesy for me when they raised my grandfathered family plan

I’m thinking that I might buy it once we have creation kit access and mods that add story and flesh out the game a la Fusion City Rising and companion mods for Fallout 4

They sent me a claim form for a steering wheel lock. I traded the vehicle in for a Ford

Selling the data, presumably

Alphabet’s monopoly is bad, make no mistake.

But they aren’t controlling all electronic means of communication for 90% of the continental United States, as AT&T did in the ma’ bell and pa’ bell days.

When you browse to a website, your browser passes info about itself to the server hosting that site. This info is intended to help the server provide the best rendering code for your browser. This is called your User Agent.

However, Google is using it here to identify Firefox users, and is apparently choosing to lump them all in a box called “adblock users” instead of trying to identify an ad blocker more accurately.

The president/protagonist of Saints Row IV

Wait- OnePlus is good, actually? Last I heard was massive disappointment in the company

Might be too late for that, but BOY do I have a bridge to sell you!

I've been subscribed to the same family plan, since about 2014ish. I like it, but really don't appreciate that they raised the price for basically fuck all. Only reason I haven't canceled it is that creators I watch on YouTube get far more from me as a Premium user than ad-based viewership

Turns out, yes it was. For Samba shares, SELinux requires every file to have the sudo semanage fcontext --add --type "samba_share_t" command run on it. And of course, the new files wouldn’t have had this like the ones that were present when I was setting up Samba…

I expanded my search to making a post on the Fedora forums, where an @/glb pointed out that fact, and thankfully was able to also state that adding it to fstab for the drive will automate that process at boot. So the issue is now solved, thanks to glb over here: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/file-sharing-woes-samba-nfs-sftp/91112/13

Thanks for responding!

So I don’t know what file access logs I should look at. All the samba logs have essentially had nothing at all in them except for variations on [2023/09/28 23:50:31, 0] ../../source3/rpc_server/rpc_worker.c:1125(rpc_worker_main) rpcd_winreg version 4.18.6 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2023

so it doesn’t seem like they’re going to be of any help here…

The new files do show and launch on the server itself just fine.

Stopping samba does produce the expected timeout errors on clients

Renamed file does show as renamed. Bonus, a new file I created on the server from context menu “New text file” entry does also show on clients

Server is running on Fedora Linux 38

Wife and I have decided on Raven’s Hoard (which of course becomes just ravenshoard as a hostname)

::1 and the same?

…ok that was a bad pun

Wouldn’t this also kill every legitimate use of VPN? Like, what every fucking company uses between sites, for remote workers, etc?

“*arr stack”?

If you feel up for a bit of a project, you might be able to disable that “protection” with adb

Isn’t that what tburkhol addressed in their first paragraph? Or are you suggesting further steps than just putting those devices behind NAT? I am not at all trying to be snarky, I actually want to know more about this.