Haha what you on about. The EU have declined this over and over.

The reason it keeps coming up is because the EU is a democracy, where every member state can propose things.

Your critisism is towards the few politicians proposing this. Not the EU, who, so far, has been on our side.

Scary thing is he didnt really accomplish much with his sacrifies. NSA is much scarier today and things just goes on.

That’s the thing isnt it. It’s forcing AI companies to shut them down and only provide them to people the US government has a deal with, themselves and the elites.

We cant have power to the people.

Fucking hell, can we get an age and qualification limit on politicians already?

Discovering bugs is not “AI slop”.

That term refers to something the AI made. This is just product testing, where a real human then fixes it as intended.

Based.

Unfortunatly there will not be an actual pushback, because most people will always prefer convinience above almost anything else.

Even facts.

I know so many people who will use ChatGPT fully knowing it might be wrong. They dont care.

Scary, right?

I know what the article says, but I’m just adressing the headline with a missuse of the term AI.

It’s like saying “is sport profitable” and then only talking about a specific genre.

It’s way too broad to say “is AI profitable” because it spends from LLMs, image generation to DNA sequense modelling.

Was it profitable to run protein analysis with AI? Yes.

Is it profitable to run ChatGPT? No.

Is the survalliance power with Palintir worth it? Yes, but for controlling the masses.

So what is this question even asking?

The legally have to because of the US Cloud Act.

Every single US company has a backdoor because of this.

Call me new fashion, but bug testing is something I would want to skip any day, if AI could find JUST 20% of my problems. And then I will fix them.

Wtf is that shit even.

Imagine having to hire someone who gets lower prices to do your shopping.

It came out that every single key and convo is available on WhatsApp’s servers, and they do access it internally. We ofc already suspected it, but now it’s confirmed.

It’s also a US company, which I think answers everything without needing more explanation.

To those who still doesnt know, look at US Cloud Act.

There’s alot of companies that doesnt sell a single thing to the US market, that makes millions.

I think we’ll be okay.

Well, it depends what you mean about “adult safe”.

There are still regulations to make sites free of harmful content. Problem is that is not enforced enough.

But do you want governments to decide what’s “adult safe”? It seems that’s an even worse approach with far more overreach than already proposed.

Adult safe should mean porn ban or explicit content, if you want to make unified rules for all ages.

We should also take into account that there factually is a difference between kid brains and adults. This is not coming from nothing, even though the proposed solution ends up being a privacy nightmare.

The idea is not bad, but also a testament to the batteries problem. The current technology in them dies too fast if this could be a viable solution.

Nice for the current state of reality, but hopefully batteries are better in the future.

Might be low, but it’s still access to the internet. Seems like a great move.

It’s almost like it’s only a data harvesting tool. Why tf should they implement it everywhere for free?

~~I think, like the rest of the world, we try to go away from US software. Windows is the big one, and China would like to go open source.

They do that because it’s the strongest weapon against capitalism in the US. That country is nothing if they cant monetize on everything.~~

EDIT: I’m an idiot. Didnt read the article, but I did now. Just pass my stupid comment.

I dont think the goal is ever to make that money.

He just tries to get everyone else to pay for his toy. And they will, because SpaceX also have military power, which is why it’s insane that such thing CAN go public.