4·
1 year agoyikes! what assholes!
Whiskey Pickle
here for the good vibes!
- 0 Posts
- 15 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: June 3rd, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
what evidence is there that this is the case?
edit: oh, I see. that’s… pretty damning!
That’s actually a debate method to basically not bring anything to the table and say everything is wrong but it’s really dumb and quite annoying, it’s however the only kind of debate most people can have these days.
i’m sure that you find it annoying when people state facts which you find inconvenient-- especially if it happens with most people you encounter…
you’re free to talk to someone else.
your failures are not my errors.
still waiting on that quote…
a failure to comprehend by you does not constitute an error on my part
just because you can’t comprehend what i’ve written doesn’t mean that i made an error. don’t blame me for your failures.
says I’m dumb cause I noticed an error on the text.
quote where i said that
i find it much less likely that everyone who disagrees with you is wrong, and that you simply fail to grasp the clear logic of something that you happen to disagree with and choose to lash out at me with insults rather than to admit you were wrong.
I understand what the text tried
[X} DOUBT
but I want to point out the writing itself is wrong
incorrect. you simply fail to comprehend it. how unfortunate.
If you try to re-read the text you can notice the writing unintentionally implies different things despite being supposed to be the same.
you’re seeing what you wish to.
lol, no. of course not.
that’s not an error by the writer, that’s an error in your understanding of the text and the meaning of the word “paradox”.
in what way? if it’s so wrong, it should be easy for you to prove, logically.
The paradox of tolerance states that if a society is tolerant without limit, its ability to be tolerant is eventually seized or destroyed by the intolerant. Karl Popper described it as the seemingly self-contradictory idea that in order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must retain the right to be intolerant of intolerance.
It gains power by creeping in via democratic processes and slowly undermining them through manipulation and fear.
yikes! what assholes!