its hot, water will evaporate no matter what the cotton wants. the longer the fabric stays wet, the longer the wearer will be cool.

comfort it :P

Cost. Cotton is less expensive than linen, easier to maintain, and more widely available. Banana fiber is also quite cool but is not widely available.

Indian here, so experienced with hot climate.

• Wear loose cotton clothes (long-sleeved if stepping out in the hot sun)
• Keep yourself hydrated.
• Avoid soft/ aerated drinks/ soda & coffee as they’ll dehydrate you. Stick to cool water, ice chips, fresh lemonade made with water, fresh fruit juices, melons, spinach-cucumber-onion-tomato salads, yoghurt,
• Eat light.
• Stick to well-ventilated rooms with good air-circulation (fans help)
• Cold water showers to cool down
• Sweating is good. It’ll cool you down. This is also why Indians eat spicy food and drink hot tea even in hottest summer. Get sweaty then take a quick cold-water rinse.
• If you have to step outside in the hot sun, umbrella, hats, caps etc are your friends.
• Wet towel on the back of the neck for a quick cool down.
  Good luck.

While viscose dries faster than cotton, but cotton is a breathable fabric and lets you sweat, which cools you down. - Indian here, so have some experience living with hot weather.

Loose, long-sleeved cotton clothes will prevent sunburn + cool you down.

Lower their b.s. tolerance.

Is that longated moskowrat speak for " That’s why I won’t paying my twitter employees their wages."

No.

Update from a week back : https://vlemmy.net/comment/631706

tl;dr : They survived.

2 idiots got into a “u.no u” fight on one of my threads that escalated into them brigading each other. Even the block feature didn’t work for a while.

As far as they are concerned, he is a brown working-class liberal anarchist Middle-Eastern Jew who hates the rich, consorts with the poor, and should be crucified. Should he become popular post-mortem, then they’ll simply appropriate his name and carry on as usual.

They need cheap child labour to keep their profits up. Won’t you think of the poor billionaires?

They are not pro-life. If they were pro-life they would work to make life good/ better for those who they insist birth children and for those who they should be born.

They are pro-slavery, Forcing/ coercing women to be incubators against their will is sexual slavery. They refuse to consider women as equal human beings with equal rights to men, and seek to diminsh women’s independence by forcing on her (and only her, men are not held accountable) to the unwanted burden of gestating, birthing, and caring for children, even at the cosf of her physical and mental well-being.

Their call of “fetal personhood” is a tool to emotionally manipulate people (“won’t you think of the children?”), while they deny actual living persons their personhood. All their actions & words are geared towards dehumanizing women.

Tellingly, they also are not against child labour (“wont you think of the billionaire’s profits?”), once a child is born. Their goal is to deny women their personhood, bind women to sexual slavery, and ensure the wealthy have a supply of cheap & easily available labour.

Thank you for making clear

1. your utter contempt for women,
2. your denial of women as human beings with human rights, and
3. your misconception that you and other anti-abortionists are arbiters of human rights

ps: How is an unwanted pregnancy is a “self-imposed situation”? Is it your understanding that women are capable of parthenogenesis?

I bet facebook/ meta paid them to endorse the birdsite.

Oh yep, you seem to have a flexible mentality, open to debate and not demonizing others, the opposite of what fascists typically do.

And there’s the DARVO. That didn’t take much time.

If foetuses are babies to anti-abortionists (you’ve dropped the pro-life facade) then anti-abortionists need science lessons, because foetuses are not babies.

Since anti-abortionists don’t consider women as human beings possessing equal human rights, they don’t care about any baby born or unborn from her. Indeed, they think they have the right to dictate to women on what her rights should be, ignoring that she is born with inalienable basic rights. “Born with” not ‘unborn/ in-utero’ with.

A right to life without right to agency is slavery. Do you understand that anti-abortionists want women to be slaves?

Read this somewhere “If something is banned in EU it likely violates human rights, but if something is banned in a republican state it probably is a human right.”

:(

Thanks to Citizens United, corporations are people. But people are not corporations.

They do not have an army of corporate attorneys, nor do they employ lobbying firms to buy political support, nor do they have enormous wealth to fall back on. People simply do not enjoy the protections corporations do. Yet its regular people who frequently take a stand against wrong, and not multi-billion corporations.

Facebook/Meta, a corporate with tremendous resources, made promises about defending access to reproductive healthcare in a post-Roe world and it should be questioned for failing to keep their word. Getting personal (like you just did with @Kichae) just shifts responsibility away from facebook/meta for its actions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late_termination_of_pregnancy

I’m sorry. I completely misunderstood and assumed you were replying to me. I apologize and have deleted my misguided response.