• Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    The article doesn’t talk about the fact that the increase is far greater in dark conditions, which is not readily explained by the changes to car design the article discusses.

    This article talks more about that, and the linked report suggests population trends have contributed to more people walking at night along arterial roads with poor pedestrian infrastructure.

    To be clear, daytime fatalities are up by about 40% in the interval shown, which is much more than the increase in population. Increasing vehicle size and hood height are real problems too, but don’t seem to be the biggest factor.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      Daytime fatalities are up 26.5% on this graph. Not good, but not 40%. Population growth was 8.5% over that period

      • village604@adultswim.fan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Vehicle numbers are also an important metric to look at, as they grew about 16-17% during the same timeframe. Add the two together and you’re not far from 26.5%.

        • Logi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I don’t think you can just add those together since an added person will mostly also be an added car. In fact, since cars grew faster than people, perhaps there are fewer pedestrians now. We can’t really say.