• mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because the venn diagram of “people who would maliciously do something like this” and “people with good enough photoshop skills to make it look realistic” were nearly two separate circles. AI has added a third “people with access to AI image generators” circle, and it has a LOT of overlap with the second group simply because it is so large.

  • deathbird@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    AI creating jobs by requiring more human intervention for validation of previously reliable forms of information?

    Okay cool, I’m here for it.

  • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    A BBC journalist ran the image through an AI chatbot which identified key spots that may have been manipulated.

    What the actual fuck? You couldn’t spare someone to just go look at the fucking thing rather than asking ChatGPT to spin you a tale? What are we even doing here, BBC?

    A photo taken by a BBC North West Tonight reporter showed the bridge is undamaged

    So they did. Why are we talking about ChatGPT then? You could just leave that part out. It’s useless. Obviously a fake photo has been manipulated. Why bother asking?