• bitsplease@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s honestly crazy how many people can read Dune and completely misunderstand the themes of the book.

    Though to be fair, it sometimes feels like Frank himself didn’t fully understand what themes he was going for. Books 1-3 were staunchly “Beware of heroes, charismatic leaders will lead you to evil and despair”, then in GEoD, we find that literally the only hope for humanity was millenia of oppression by a totalitarian government.

    But either of those two takes is still wildly better than “spice saves the universe” lol

    • irmoz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It wasn’t the qctual only hope, just the only path Paul and Leto could see, and we know they aren’t omniscient

    • Koffiato@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dune has one of the most complex (and necessarily logical) universe in it. I’m not surprised every reader found different themes more fitting.

      • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Dune had no good guys, none at all.

        Everyone was out for themselves or their narrow view of what was just and best for humanity from their simplistic and self-centered perspective.

        Leto 2 was the exception because he was out for his narrow view of what was best for humanity from his broad, self-centered perspective that still didn’t really lead anywhere.

        The actual point of the books is that no ideal survives the test of real time, and over time civilization tends to ossify, so we are doomed to catastrophe by our very nature.