A few years ago, Amazon chairman Jeff Bezos revealed how he thinks of local PC hardware as antiquated, ready to be replaced by cloud options from companies like AWS and Azure.

Bucha Bull to me.

  • wuffah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    132
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    We went from mass surveillance to hardware confiscation real quick.

    These companies are so large that they don’t need the consumer market anymore. The consumer is now the competition. They can essentially purchase the entire planet’s output of computing hardware years in advance to force us out of the market and lease it back to us at inflated rates. Then, they turn all that tensor compute against us to make everyone’s life a living digital surveillance hell.

    Forget Internet freedom, computational liberty is now at risk. Who needs all that expensive legal and technological architecture to steal your data, report on you to the government, and enforce DRM when they control bare metal access to your rented corporate cloud hardware because consumer PC equipment is too astronomically expensive to afford for the average person?

    We need to elevate the prosecution of anti-trust to the level of religious inquisition, and burn these companies at the stake. They’re using AI to literally enslave humanity, and it’s working.

    • shoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      To be honest I don’t have any personal digital information that I give a shit about. It’s value is only derived from its ability to identify + track me, either for my convenience or for the highest bidder’s. Computational liberty is only an issue because we’ve made everything digital by default and that mindset has leaked into critical social functions (taxes, law, logistics, healthcare, etc…).

      Software and data bloat is more astronomical than most people realize. Only about 10% of persisted data is ever touched again (don’t look up the ecological implications). Amazon could capture 90% of all compute hardware and the entire human race could get by just fine on 10%. We wouldn’t have access to niceties like app stores full of niche apps, 24MP phone cameras, 4k movies, 10 sluggish layers of software abstraction, 15 years of photos you never look at, etc…

      But you could run a simple message server on basically any scrap of IoT e-waste. A highly available static website can be hosted with an old phone and a solar panel. Any device (fridge/watch/calculator/pregnancy test) can run Doom. All of Apollo 11’s source code is a fraction of the size of most web pages.

      We’re continously expanding our hardware usage for infinitesimally small gains. We should demand that our governments legislate digital austerity for dozens of reasons, just pick what resonates best for you. Personal privacy, energy usage, ecological damage, corporate capture, information rot, brittle supply chains, national security, etc…

      • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yes, and also - if something was normal in 80s, it won’t stop being possible in 2030s. In some sense our civilization now is just reveling in the sea of computational power used wastefully.

        There was a moment when I moved from an old PC with 512 MB RAM which seemed nice, but was becoming a bit weak for games and all, to a newer C2D PC with 2 GB RAM. I felt it can do anything I’ll ever need. And web aside, it still can do most.

        And that old PC, if we compare it to a machine good for year 1999, was very powerful. And 1999 is around Matrix and Phantom Menace, and the X-Wing: Alliance game, and ICQ popularity growing.

        More and more resources spent for the same or less social satisfaction. People like talking in money and graphs and industry slang, but honestly social satisfaction is a far better optimized mechanism than these.

        Adopting a kitten seems still more satisfying than computing, but the gap in year 1999 was subjectively less than now.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        The old technologies that we used to use for websites never really went away. They’re still around, and you can use them to make websites again if you want.

        It’s just that it won’t be as fancy looking as a newer web-site, but you don’t lose too much on functionality.

      • redlemace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t have any personal digital information that I give a shit about

        Genuin question. How do you classify your photo’s ? (That’s the data I care about most. almost everything else can be reproduced or is just a pitty if lost)

        • shoo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Photos are the same as most other data, you can store them pretty easily long-term in a physical medium. Of course, capturing an image is much easier and more convenient with a digital device, but that doesn’t mean it has to live digitally indefinitely. It’s simple enough to have an instant digital camera with a built in printer and access to a high quality scanner.

          If you held a gun to my head, I could pick out a few dozen personal photos that I own that are worth saving physically. If you allowed me a modern flash drive’s worth of storage (64-128GB, ~5000 good quality images), I could pretty easily store every picture worth a second look from my entire lifetime.

          Apple’s marketing driven perception that every single person needs a cinema quality camera (and cinema sized storage) in their pocket is ludicrous. Only a tiny fraction of people actually truly need that. Let them borrow that gear from a library if we want to preserve fair access.

    • Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is essentially market manipulation via speculation. The artificially create scarcity to drive up demand and price. They do it with food, they do it with housing, and they do it with healthcare. The basic things we need to survive are being held by fewer and fewer owners; then held hostage by those owners via monopolization; just to squeeze more from us. The earth is a fucking resort for the 3000 billionaires in this world, and the rest of us are allowed to work here at the pleasure of our overlords.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      FINALLY SOMEONE GETS IT

      I’ve been screaming this since Crucial closed up

      • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        People have been screaming this since right to repair, since FOSS, since Microsoft in the 90s, since stallman. Consumers consistently lose because the vast majority of people don’t give a shit and politicians that could regulate our way out of this are easily purchased.

    • Rigal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      At this pace they will make owning a compyter illegal. Being everything a remote service governments doesnt need to preoccupy by cryptography and business will not have to worry about addblockers and user profiling will be easier.

  • merdaverse@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 month ago

    Unsurprising that capitalists want to seize all the means of computation for themselves.

  • Almacca@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 month ago

    Hey Jeff — you know what I think is antiquated and should be relegated to the annals of history?

    Billionaires.

    Go away and live your life of luxury and shut the fuck up. Don’t you have enough fucking money?

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 month ago

    yeah you know what i always thought hey this PC cost me a lot, i wish I could keep paying for it indefinitely.

  • melfie@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 month ago

    When AWS had the major outage recently, my self-hosted services kept on running. The programs on my Linux machines and other devices I own were also not impacted. Thanks, Jeff, but I’ll stick with my “antiques”. Also, fuck you.

    • CaptKoala@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Friends of mine complained they couldn’t watch stuff and I replied “huh, my Plex is working fine.”

  • morto@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 month ago

    A few years ago, Amazon chairman Jeff Bezos revealed how he thinks of local PC hardware as antiquated

    People should be more aware that appeal to making you feel old or antiquated is one of the main strategies from corporations to push their products into you.

    No, you’re not antiquated. Just be yourself and do things the way you like to do, not the way corporations want to force you into. No one should judge you, and if they do, they’re wrong for judging others for their way to do things. Don’t fall for that trap

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      If building from wood is not antiquated, then surely local hardware isn’t.

      But their power is built on function fulfilled, and unless there is an alternative, they are the future.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    Everything a subscription. You’ll own nothing and like it!

    And, people, I can’t stress this enough, FUCK JEFF BEZOS!

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I mean, that’s absolutely where this is going at a business level. Cloud computing has been in the cards for decades, and the only real question is who will do the hosting.

    With the price of RAM and CPUs going asymptotic, these big cloud compute companies are building an effective monopoly on high end processing capacity. They’re cornering the market on hardware. Eventually, you either use their computers or you stick with legacy hardware (that’s seeded with Planned Obsolescence time bombs) or you (shudders just to think of it) start buying computers from CHINA.

    When you think about it, there’s really only one option.

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      From an IT operations perspective this makes so much sense they’ve already tried it before. They were called “thin clients” and just had enough compute and network to connect to run remote desktop software.

      This greatly reduces the amount of spending you need to build out a large corporate network, and centralizes management just like they already do for servers with stuff like VMWare.

  • daannii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s Nvidia’s whole game plan. Subscription to use their hardware. Limits on hours of gaming. Pay to play more hours.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 month ago

    Every 5 years someone invests a bunch of money into thin clients, and then we’re right back where we started.

    I’ll believe it’s possible when America’s networking infrastructure isn’t covered in holes.

  • Foofighter@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Step 1: Raise sales prices artificially

    Step 2: Create affordable alternatives to rent.

    Step 3: Wait until enough people claim that its cheaper and more comfortable to just rent.

    Step 4: Wait until maket is destroyed.

    Step 6: Raise prices.

    “You will own nothing and you will be happy”

    • Blackstone