• just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think it’s more about closing a backdoor to free product that was generally out of reach for most people a few years. Free API access for devs has been a thing forever for the most part, but the barriers are now lower for people to abuse it.

        Yes about profits in the sense they don’t want people getting free access to content, but I don’t think this is designed to net them a bunch of money or anything.

  • Christopher@lemmy.grey.fail
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    Man, this kind of sucks.

    I wrote a nifty script a few years ago that pulls the popularity metric of a song, converts that to a star rating, and writes that to a tag with Mutagen. At a glance I can see the hits. If I like the track, I’ll “love” it (side stepping the need for a personal rating). It’s a system that’s been serving me well for a long time.

    Locking down APIs does seem to be the trend. I’m not sure I’ll look to adapt.

    Giving money to Spotify is out of the question, but I may pay for Deezer or something.

    • murmelade@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      The 350GB I already downloaded should last me a while. Doesn’t it already get the metadata from Deezer, and flacs from Tidal/Qobuz/Amazon, anyway? Not sure why Spotify needs to be involved.