• Alex@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Kernel access isn’t needed if they use signed boot and can verify everything running is what it should be.

      • Alex@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        You want to be sure if the integrity of the binaries that are running. That needs a chain of trust from firmware to user space.

        • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          44
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          ‘Never trust the client’, an adage that modern game developers have apparently forgotten. The only thing one can ultimately trust is the server. Anything client-side, beyond keeping honest people honest, is doomed to failure.

          Regular (ie, not kernel-level) anti-cheat is as far as it needs to go. Anything delving past that, such as into kernels, is dumb and an increasing level of security risk for the consumer.

          • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            6 months ago

            Kernel level AC only makes sense if you’re not selling games, you’re selling platforms for micro transactions.

            They don’t give a fuck about a ‘true’ gameplay experience.

            They do give a fuck about not being able to groom children into gambling addictions later in life, and making astounding amounts of money while doing so.

        • yucandu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Why care about the binaries when you can have AI write you a script for an ESP32 to scan a video camera and mimic hardware mouse inputs?