Elon Musk’s xAI has lost its bid for a preliminary injunction that would have temporarily blocked California from enforcing a law that requires AI firms to publicly share information about their training data.
xAI had tried to argue that California’s Assembly Bill 2013 (AB 2013) forced AI firms to disclose carefully guarded trade secrets.
The law requires AI developers whose models are accessible in the state to clearly explain which dataset sources were used to train models, when the data was collected, if the collection is ongoing, and whether the datasets include any data protected by copyrights, trademarks, or patents. Disclosures would also clarify whether companies licensed or purchased training data and whether the training data included any personal information. It would also help consumers assess how much synthetic data was used to train the model, which could serve as a measure of quality.
Oh no how unfortunate.
Why is his CSAM generator still in app stores?
Who is going to remove it? Trump’s friend Tim Cook? Trump’s friend Jeff Bezos? Trump’s friend Sundar Pichai? Or Trump’s friend Satya Nadella?
Hey, maybe Musk is even right that this will lead to the death of xAI; I do not see a downside in this.
Xitter or xAI shouldn‘t be allowed anyway and California cyberlaws are bonkers. I would hope both instances tear each other apart.
I DONT care WHERE they got the Data ALL I want is to be Able to make ACCURATE CSAM!
-Elon Musk and Republicans!
deleted by creator
what’s stripping these companies lying about their financial data to tax authorities?
there are lots of self-report mechanisms that we use… it’s just not worth the blowback of non-disclosure to lie about it. some people do, and sometimes they get caught; not always, but overall it’s a net benefit to transparency
deleted by creator
for large companies, i think you’re probably right… but there are plenty of transactions that happen cash. i think it’s a case of not letting perfect be the enemy of better. some people might lie, and if they get caught that should have some punishment… but we hope that most people don’t lie, because the risk just isn’t worth it
He probably doesn’t want to disclose that CSAM was included.
Oh no! Better kys Elon!
Ah, finally, someone starts it. A person is allowed to say publicly what they want. But a LLM is not a person but a commercial interest. The LLM should never have been allowed to public from start, as the misinformation machines they are currently. EU, please follow up.
Some of it will have DOGE as a source.
Awww. Too bad… so sad…
Oh no! Anyways
The more you can rattle his cage the better





