• Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sure, but reddit (& Lemmy) hyperventilating about this as if the milktoast laws are the same as full retenal scanning verified by Palantir has completely destroyed any sort of sensible discussion around this.

    Personally I think doing nothing isn’t an option and so the unverified age API approach is the least bad solution i’ve seen.

    And much better than pushing the verification server side. The main argument I’ve seen against it is either:

    • slippery nipples means that at some point a different worse law could be passed, which is possible, but worse laws have already been passed elsewhere so if that was the intent they could have gone for it in CA/CO

    • Parents should watch their kids better, which is disingenuous as this is litterally adding a tool to help do that in a standard way, rather than some flakey survailance app.