• shrek_is_love@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    if the problem is that major platforms are centralized, opaque, and controlled by corporations, why would the solution be yet another centralized platform controlled by a corporation?

    Because people are brainwashed into only trusting billionaires, corporations, brand names, and consumer packaged goods to solve all our problems.

    • Schwim Dandy@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      In this case, I think it’s target user isn’t looking to get out from under the billionaires and corpos, just the American billionaires and corpos. That’s who eyou is designed to appeal to.

      The tiny number of people who are anti billionaire and corpos-run social media regardless of nationality already have our very tiny corner carved out.

      • Dorian Diaconu@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yup. Sadly it is what it is. I kind of expected a push for the defederalized solutions in the current cirtumstances

    • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The alternative is Facebook with lies that go unchecked completely. This is actually an area where AI is not bad.

      edit: sigh. Refusing to acknowledge where things can be useful. NO, ALL BAD. BAD BAD BAD! AI BAD! ALWAYS BAD! NO USE! NO GOOD! ONLY BAD! BAD BAD BAD! Such fucking blindness.

      • FreddyNO@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        The system that is notorious for lying being used for fact checking. Yea maybe you should write “bad” in caps lock one more time, that will make you right.

        • mimavox@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          If i’s implemented the right way, it could be. AI can be used for good things even if the knee-jerk reaction of so many people online is to equate it with crap.

          • LuceVendemiaire@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Recoiling upon smelling shit is also a kneejerk reaction

            its always this same bullshit, “if we just implemented this correctly” where can an AI participate in fact-checking? It can’t be trusted because of hallucinations, so the solution would be to uh… manually review everything it does? just rely on third parties to do it? What ACTUAL USE does this shit have?

      • LwL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I doubt it, honestly. It’d likely catch a lot of misinfo, yes, but it would likely also classify any new findings that run counter to previous assumptions as misinfo. LLMs can’t keep up to date. And they still have the same issue that whoever trains them gets to decide what is and isn’t misinfo, which starts being a problem when it’s an ubiquitous social media site.

  • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    The problem is building the network. Nobody uses it because nobody uses it and nobody will use it until everybody uses it.

    That has always been and will always be the primary problem. You can solve all of the other problems and it won’t matter.

    • Dorian Diaconu@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      It used to be easier to spread the word when there weren’t so many alternatives, to be honest. Right now, I’m not sure how to convince people.

      • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I disagree. This has been a thing for 20+ years. Facebook started out the same way. So did reddit. That’s one reason the founders of reddit created mulitple accounts to post from at first - to make the network look larger than it was.

        I’ve joined several networks over the years that didn’t pan out. The one I remember from a few years ago was Imzy. Good platform, just didn’t take off.

  • rossman@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Unless we can increase our mental loads, more of anything doesn’t really work.

    Lemmy is the thing I’ll use until there’s new protocols that focus on privacy or something else.

  • ropatrick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    23 days ago

    eYou, you are simply too late to the party. As the piece highlights in the early paragraphs, its already being done by Mastodon and the Feds (the good Feds).

    I just discovered Mastodon and the Feds (that should be the name of a band) and I’m utterly thrilled to have control of what I see. Its a breath of fresh air. I look forward to my feed every day. I know its not going to be full of bollocks about Trump and other toxic stuff. Its a game changer for me.

    The future is FOSS and data sovereignty and I feel a little bit closer to it today that I ever have.

    🙏🏼

  • kubofhromoslav@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    A classical sign of an early worldcentric worldview that is more about competition than about collaboration. A level “orange” in Integral theory. But humankind is continuing its development to late worldcentric worldview “green” level and more. And Fediverse is helping with that!