• FoundTheVegan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Once its out there that’s it.

    But the subject put it out themslevss. More over, they paid for it be used. No one was tricked, captured or coerced in to giving their DNA.

    As opposed to an artist who is promoting themselves and their craft, used without their knowledge to replicate their work.

    • WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      By biological father was an anonymous sperm donor before the technology to sequence a person’s DNA for under 10 billion dollars was a thing. They did not give their DNA to ancestry. Their sister did, having no clue that her brother had donated. Yet ancestry has matched her to several nieces and nephews, outing her brother’s history to his sister and the children who were never supposed to have access to that info. It’s not just your own information.

      Similarly, one of my half siblings suddenly found out that his dad wasn’t his birth dad.

      Anyways, he happens to be cool with the fact that he suddenly had contact with offspring who weren’t supposed to know who he was.

      But our DNA is interconnected. It doesn’t just belong to one person.

      • probablyaCat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s interconnected, sure, but I think you’d have an uphill battle that it doesn’t belong to that person.