• partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It’s a supercomputer center, so I imagine large data transfer is normal in the environment. They could have piggybacked on existing high-throughput data workflows, or somehow blended into expected large transfers. Data can be exfiltrated over weeks or months, across multiple endpoints or accounts, … and compression could have happened prior to transfer (meaning the transfer may have been smaller than 10PB). Monitoring could have been inadequate or bypassed.

      I imagine the puny change could be indicative of wanting a fast sale. Possibly, if they decided to store the data on cloud drives via a credit line. They might want a sale before the bill comes.

      Edit: yup

      According to the alleged attacker, they gained access through a compromised VPN domain, then deployed a botnet to extract data. Instead of transferring data in bulk, the attacker distributed the exfiltration across multiple systems and moved ‘smaller’ amounts over about six months to avoid detection. Such a method relies more on exploiting system architecture than on advanced hacking techniques, which in part helped the perpetrator to avoid detection.

  • in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Curious to see if another LeakBase will pop up around this. I’m already hearing rumors that a lot of it was AI training data but that’s unfounded squiddy speak on social media.

  • thisbenzingring@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    you’d need a data center just to hold that much information! it’s not like your using cloud storage for this, this is an expensive payload