ElCanut@jlai.lu to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 2 years agoOh no ...jlai.luimagemessage-square213linkfedilinkarrow-up11.1Karrow-down166
arrow-up11.03Karrow-down1imageOh no ...jlai.luElCanut@jlai.lu to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square213linkfedilink
minus-squareBaut [she/her] auf.@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoX’ architecture is insecure. There’s no isolation between windows, and each process can spy on your input. That’s just one example. Wayland is necessary.
minus-squareExLisper@linux.communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoYet no known active exploits use this insecure architecture to cause actual harm. It’s just another FUD.
X’ architecture is insecure. There’s no isolation between windows, and each process can spy on your input. That’s just one example.
Wayland is necessary.
Yet no known active exploits use this insecure architecture to cause actual harm. It’s just another FUD.