Online threats to children are real, but the headlong pursuit of age verification that we’re seeing around the world is unacceptable in its approach and far too broad in scope — and we simply can’t afford to get this wrong.

To be clear, parents’ concerns are valid and sincere. Few people would argue that kids should have unfettered access to adult material, to self-harm how-tos, to social media platforms that manipulate them and expose them to abuse.

But it’s the very depth of those worries that is being cynically exploited. Age verification as is currently being proposed in country after country would mean the death of anonymity online.

And we know exactly who stands to gain: The same tech giants who built the privacy nightmare that the internet is today.

  • AverageEarthling@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    I mean, I’ve got boxes full of physical books and self hosted movies and Tv. At that point, I’ll just stop using the internet. I need to go outside more anyway.

    • zewm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      10 days ago

      Finally all my friends that been giving me shit about having a dvd collection can eat shit.

      • moakley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 days ago

        I was finally ready to clean out my closet and get rid of all my old movies and games. But now…

      • AoxoMoxoA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 days ago

        I’ve got a mean collection myself. I have saved every cassette, record , DVD , VHS , book , magazine ( some bit the dust but anything with good info stayed) , zine and CD I’ve ever baught since I was a young teen ( and their many versions of various players for the many formats)

        I’ve had more than a few people appear angry that I have kept all these “things” in my life. Blows my mind that they never saw this coming. …I guess I can rent my dad’s and books

      • gurty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        I put my 500+ collection of DVDs into several of those old CD storage sleeves cases you used to see back in the 90s. They are safe and sound, ready for when things go too far.

          • gurty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 days ago

            This was fun to zoom in on and check the titles. Also, good to see an All Elite fan in the wild.

            • zewm@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 days ago

              I’ve been watching wrestling since the late 80s and I enjoy all the promotions. I stopped watching regularly around 2002ish. I came back when AEW debuted. I tried watching WWE but it just lost its spark for me. I keep up with news and clips but I don’t watch the weekly programming.

              Any standout movies?

              • gurty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 days ago

                Cube 2 is an obscure gem for me. I really like ‘where are we and how did we get here?’ horror movies. Not sure if you saw Cube 3 but it was… not aa good, lmao.

                • zewm@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  I have only seen the first one, but I did hear Cube Zero was the weakest of the lot.

        • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 days ago

          Disc rot is still a thing. Warner Bros DVDs produced between 2005 and 2009 are especially affected.

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      10 days ago

      “Age Verification” is just them attaching “THINK OF THE CHILDREN” to their push to have every single bit of information about every person on the planet.

      • Clbull@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 days ago

        All the more ironic when you realise that some of the big businessmen and lobbyists pushing for mandatory age verification checks are in the Epstein Files. Basically the kind of people who you don’t want to be thinking of the children…

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Social media functions as a kind of gatekeeper for public interactions, not unlike credit scores, driver’s licenses, and college degrees. The absence of a presence on social media is not only socially debilitating (you’re cut out of the information stream for local events and public amenities) but a red-flag for college recruiters and employers. It’s much like how not using a credit card regularly in your teens/20s impacts your ability to access low-interest lending in your 30s/40s. Or not having a driver’s license interferes with your right to vote.

      State officials have been searching for a kind of uniform, iron-clad, easily verifiable public ID for ages. Linking your online presence (a thing that you need for a myriad of daily tasks) to your ID becomes a pathway to this goal. Universal, non-transferable digital ID becomes a wicked two-edged sword as it both exhaustively tracks the “documented” individuals and neatly severs the “undocumented” from society.

      • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Na bro social media is nothing like credit score. You’re totally fine not having facebook, all these municipalities have websites, you don’t need social media for anything.

        And even credit scores, you just want it for like two years before buying a home, it’s no problem at all especially in contrast to the challenge of actually saving up enough money to buy a home.

        State officials have been searching for a kind of uniform, iron-clad, easily verifiable public ID for ages

        What are you talking about? People have been voting, paying taxes, applying for driver’s licenses, for ages online, they all have usernames and passwords with uploaded proof of ID for their online government transactions.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Na bro social media is nothing like credit score.

          You might want to talk to folks in recruiting or HR. Everyone checks your social media history when they’re evaluating you.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Anyone who could not see that Trump was going to extort business for his own personal gain was clueless to Trump and his cabinet of blackmailers.

      Anyone of color giving support to White Nationalists is fucking insane and shows a complete lack of understanding of current US politics.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      The nightmare trap of the Two Party System is that you can look at one party cozying up to Big Tech (Obama in 2009) and conclude the other party must be reflexively in opposition.

      Trump was fully surrounded by Thiel goons before he’d even left office in '21. And the relationship only got tighter with his Elon Musk Bromance. But hey, if you’d just elected Kamala Harris and Liz Cheney Tim Walz to the White House, I’m sure nobody would be talking about how much of their cabinet was stuffed with Silicon Valley cutouts.

      It’s not like a cartel of trillionaires can buy up both parties at once, right?

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Sort of, but my point is he made a specific point of praising a demented rapist and lauding the pedophile party as heroes. Silicon Valley cutouts that support Democrats commit the unforgivable sins of praising diversity or working to solve climate problems. They’re not surveilling hospitals for ICE. This guy loves trump because he believes trump has any opinion or knowledge of tech monopolies.

        Tone deaf doesn’t cover it. If he sold shoes, it’d be one thing. But he jumped head first into the cesspit for no reason other than he believed it.

        And so, even though our opinions on age verification coincidentally align, he can fuck right off.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 days ago

          he made a specific point of praising a demented rapist and lauding the pedophile party as heroes

          He made a point of praising a President’s pick for the Antitrust Division of the DOJ. He didn’t praise Trump and he certainly didn’t praise pedophilia.

          Slater’s tenure at DOJ was short-lived and unremarkable. So feel free to mock Yen on those grounds. But this has dick all to do with Epstein. It has nothing to do with the bloated ICE budget (which received bipartisan approval) or the assorts nightmarish cabinet appointments, many of which enjoyed supermajority support in the Senate (Rub’em All Out Rubio was appointed unanimously ffs).

          he jumped head first into the cesspit for no reason other than he believed it.

          He’s a Tech Goon and Trump had a ton of Tech Goons on his team. These people aren’t partisan, they’re corporate lemmings. By 2028, I’m sure Yen will be lining up to brown nose the incoming Dem administration. By 2032, he’ll be back on Team R, shocked at how the party that did everything Tech wanted has betrayed his customers again. Oh, and incidentally, insisting that the only way to protect yourself from Mean Old Big Government is by upping your Proton License to Double Super Secure.

          And so, even though our opinions on age verification coincidentally align, he can fuck right off.

          He’s endorsing the poison so he can sell the antidote.

          • Optional@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            He didn’t praise Trump and he certainly didn’t praise pedophilia.

            Disagree. “Great job Mr. president!” is praising trump, and praising trump is praising pedophile protectors. It’s noteven a big leap, or unconfirmed rumors. We have multiple witness accounts to his actions and nothing has been done - legally- following the initial release of many documents.

            It has nothing to do with the bloated ICE budget (which received bipartisan approval) or the assorts nightmarish cabinet appointments, many of which enjoyed supermajority support in the Senate

            Also disagree. Eighth-graders know what trump is about. Andy Yen knows what trump is about. Corruption, fascism, incompetence. Yeah let’s send a hoo-rah tweet to my (whatever # followers)

            (Rub’em All Out Rubio was appointed unanimously ffs).

            Yeah that’s disgusting. Although I assumed he was just stupid and corrupt, not flat out evil as has revealed himself to be.

            These people aren’t partisan, they’re corporate lemmings.

            He’s both. There’s no non-partisan support of trump, he’s made sure of it.

            By 2028, I’m sure Yen will be lining up to brown nose the incoming Dem administration. By 2032, he’ll be back on Team R, shocked at how the party that did everything Tech wanted has betrayed his customers again.

            Yeah, that’s probably right, but all the reason I’m kicking him to the curb now.

    • traxex@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      Crazy I was screamed at on Reddit for pointing out this guys hypocrisy. Glad I left his miserable platform.

  • Randelung@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    10 days ago

    Man, parents not wanting anything to do with their kids’ upbringing will believe anything, huh. They’d rather offload any and all responsibilities to automation than spend one minute teaching kids how to protect themselves.

    Then again, they probably don’t know, either.

    • FLAGSHIP@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 days ago

      I think you’re correct in both aspects for sure. Parents are certainly less involved, for the most part, in informing their kids of literally anything. It is much easier to ‘offload any and all responsibilities’ as you put it. iPad kids are a good example of this. Handing a 2yr old a video device and walking away is not parenting. This is an issue with many many topics from internet safety, to general life things, to talks about their bodies. Parents do not want to parent.

      I’d also agree, largely, the parents just don’t know, or care. Privacy is, unfortunately, a niche thing to know and care about.

    • innermachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      I see this as more like the patriot act- gover ent and big tech are pushing to elevate concerns of “the children’s safety” to violate our privacy and sell data. Same way the patriot act is so you can “keep all the evil bad man terrorists” at bay but really it’s an excuse to violate our rights “legally” in the name of “safety”.

    • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 days ago

      Yes, have a look at reticulum. No centralized addressing authority. No centralized domain naming system. Everything is globally routeable. It also just got support for transferring HTTP with RServer and MeshBrowser.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 days ago

        I always figured we would go to tor when this day came. But I keep seeing people mention all of these alternatives I have not heard of. Is this reticulum better?

      • girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        I definitely agree. Meshtastic has its uses but being a wide area network replacement is not one of them. Reticulum seems to be the mesh we all want and the technology is here, we just need to organize to make it happen.

    • Gravitywell.xYz@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Wifi HaLow is a bit closer to capable of early 00s internet speeds while reaching 1km, meshtastic and mescore reach 100x further and are good enough for text but not really capable of any media.

      More people need to adopt both, here’s hoping.

  • treesquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 days ago

    “Could” is a funny way of saying “are obviously intended to”. Stop playing around, call it out directly. Points where you must have your ID checked are, in fact, ID checkpoints.

  • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    This whole conversation is such a false dichotomy. The laws can absolutely be written such that companies are required to suspend service to any suspected child without requiring ID to use the service.

    But just like pollution and everything else we’ve let them push the buck to us.

    The problem is that politicians don’t want to legislate enforcement/oversight entities as those would piss off their owners.

    Democracies need to replace their lame duck politicians with ones that aren’t bought and owned by the shareholder class who also own the social media corporations.

  • Siegfried@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 days ago

    It bothers me that we know that this bullshit has nothing to do with the kids and is probably being lobbied by the genocide gang and AI companies, even more that it has become obvious that the only value AI has is mass monitoring, but nobody abords the real issue. We are playing their book.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      99.9% navigate the system and grow up perfectly fine, or fine enough. We shouldn’t have to completely surrender our anonymity for the tiny percentage that went wrong.

      Before the Internet, some people got weird, and in the Internet era, some people are going to go weird. Age verification isn’t going to change that.

      This isn’t about the kids. We all know it.

  • fodor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 days ago

    Kids don’t have unfettered access if they are supervised, lol. And age gating will fail regardless. So it’s a failure followed by another failure, sigh.

    • sircac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Indeed, unfettered in a literal sense cannot happen even with the most minimum supervision, but regardless of the threshold in parenting (I am not going to pardon parents responsibility on this, but good luck asserting 100% supervision), circumventions will always take place, so with more reason it cannot be used the “kids safety” argument to bring Orwellian levels to everybody’s lifes

  • west2seven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    This moron is also a MAGA appologist and enabler. I left Proton for other alternatives. They want to claim they are “politically nuetral” well if you really were you wouldnt be commenting at all on politics would you?

    • coalie@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      I must have missed a bunch. I only recall him saying he liked trumps pick for one role.

    • architect@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 days ago

      Only idiots want politically neutral, anyways. I want clear biases for the people open and free forms of communication. That’s HIGHLY political.

      Politically neutral supports fascism, always.