Clem talks about that in the comments. What are some no hassle, Debian based, rustless distros as alternative to Mint?

    • novafunc@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      The main problem is that it’s just not battle tested like GNU coreutils are. And Canonical has only tested this in one cycle, 25.10, before introducing it in an LTS. Would’ve made more sense to wait until 26.10.

      Other find problem with it being MIT licensed.

    • HelloRoot@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tG2ZMvBT8W4

      4:25

      (sorry my third party youtube frontend can’t share timestamp links)

      tldw:

      • more CVEs than the old core utils that have been tested and in prod for over 30years
      • no feature parity, so existing stuff that uses them will suddenly misbehave, when certain flags are missing
      • different license, MIT instead of copyleft, so it’s more friendly for companies to use it for profit, while abusing the work of volunteer contributors